ALVES, Elisabete et al. Acessibilidade e utilização de fontes de informação em saúde cardiovascular: perceção de doentes e médicos. Arq Med [online]. 2014, vol.28, n.5, pp.137-144.
ISSN 2183-2447.
|
|
2. Instituto Nacional de Estatística. Estatísticas demográficas 2011. Lisboa: Instituto Nacional de Estatística, IP, 2013. [ Links ] 3. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F, et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INT ERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364(9438):937-52. [ Links ] 4. Dewalt D, Berkman N, Sheridan S, Lohr K, Pignone M. Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(12):1228-39. [ Links ] 5. Direção Geral da Saúde. Programa Nacional de controlo de doenças cardiovasculares. Despacho nº. 16415/2003 (II série) – D.R. nº. 193 de 22 de Agosto, com as alterações do Despacho n.º 266/2006 do Alto Comissário da Saúde,publicado no DR, II Série, número 9, de 12 de Janeiro. Lisboa: Direção Geral da Saúde, 2006. [ Links ] 6. Jorgensen T, Capewell S, Prescott E, Allender S, Sans S, Zdrojewski T, et al. Population-level changes to promote cardiovascular health. G Ital Cardiol. (2006). 2013;14(5):393-403. [ Links ] 7. European Opinion Research Group. Eurobarometer 58.0 - European Union citizens and sources of Information about health. Directorate-General Press and Communication “Public Opinion Analysis”, 2003. [ Links ] 8. Carpenter D, DeVellis R, Fisher E, DeVellis B, Hogan S, Jordan J. The effect of conflicting medication information and physician support on medication adherence for chronically ill patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81(2):169-76. [ Links ] 9. Sarkar U, Schillinger D, Bibbins-Domingo K, Napoles A, Karliner L, Perez-Stable E. Patient-physicians’ information exchange in outpatient cardiac care: Time for a heart to heart? Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85(2):173-9. [ Links ] 10. Silva S, Fraga S. Qualitative Research in Epidemiology. In: Lunet N, editor. Epidemiology - Current Perspectives on Research and Practice. Croatia: Croatia: InTech; 2012. p. 63 - 84. [ Links ] 11. Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:45. [ Links ] 12. Krezmien E, Wanzer M, Servoss T, LaBelle S. The role of direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertisements and individual differences in getting people to talk to physicians. J Health Commun. 2011;16(8):831-48. [ Links ] 13. Hirvonen N, Huotari M-L. Understanding information practices in an health intervention. The case of preventing cardiovascular diseases in northern Finland. IJHIMR . 2013;vol 1(1):15-24. [ Links ] 14. Gaglio B, Glasgow R, Bull S. Do patient preferences for health information vary by health literacy or numeracy? A qualitative assessment. J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 3:109-21. [ Links ] 15. Del Giglio A, Abdala B, Ogawa C, Amado D, Carter D, Gomieiro F, et al. Quality of internet information available to patients on websites in Portuguese. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2012;58(6):645-9. [ Links ] 16. Misra R, Mark J, Khan S, Kukafka R. Using design principles to foster understanding of complex health concepts in consumer informatics tools. AMIA Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium AMIA Symposium. 2010;2010:492-6. [ Links ] 17. Freund T, Freund M, Mahler C, Schwantes U, Ose D, Joos S, et al. Family practice web sites: new perspectives for patient care and health information? Fam Med. 2010;42(7):501-6. [ Links ] 18. Swennen M, van der Heijden G, Boeije H, van Rheenen N, Verheul F, van der Graaf Y, et al. Doctors’ Perceptions and Use of Evidence-Based Medicine: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies. Acad Med. 2013;88(9):1384-96. [ Links ] 19. Ferket B, Colkesen E, Visser J, Spronk S, Kraaijenhagen R, Steyerberg E, et al. Systematic review of guidelines on cardiovascular risk assessment: Which recommendations should clinicians follow for a cardiovascular health check? Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(1):27-40. [ Links ] 20. World Health Organization, World Heart Federation, World Stroke Organization. Global Atlas on cardiovascular disease prevention and control Policies, strategies and interventions. In: Mendis S, Puska P, Norrving B, editors. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. [ Links ] 21. Laba T, Bleasel J, Brien J, Cass A, Howard K, Peiris D, et al. Strategies to improve adherence to medications for cardiovascular diseases in socioeconomically disadvantaged populations: A systematic review. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167(6):2430-40. [ Links ] 22. Van Dalem J, Krass I, Aslani P. Interventions promoting adherence to cardiovascular medicines. Int J Clin Pharm. 2012;34(2):295-311. [ Links ] 23. Carod-Artal FJ, Egido JA. Quality of life after stroke: the importance of a good recovery. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27 Suppl 1:204-14. [ Links ] 24. Hajjaj FM , Salek MS , Basra MK, Finlay AY. Non-clinical influences on clinical decision-making: a major challenge to evidence-based practice. J R Soc Med. 2010;103(5):178-87. [ Links ] 25. Moulaert V, Verbunt J, Bakx W, Gorgels A, de Krom M, Heuts P, et al. ‘Stand still ... , and move on’, a new early intervention service for cardiac arrest survivors and their caregivers: rationale and description of the intervention. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25(10):867-79. [ Links ] |