SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 número6Miotomia endoscópica peroral com criação do túnel na submucosa assistida por bomba de águaUma lesão subepitelial cecal incidental índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


GE-Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology

versão impressa ISSN 2341-4545

GE Port J Gastroenterol vol.25 no.6 Lisboa dez. 2018

https://doi.org/10.1159/000487035 

ENDOSCOPIC SNAPSHOT

 

Challenging Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent Removal after Successful Drainage of a Pancreatic Pseudocyst

Remoção desafiante de prótese metálica de aposição luminal após drenagem com sucesso de pseudoquisto pancreático

 

Athanasios D. Sioulasa, Konstantina Papadakia Dimitrios Schizasb, Ilias Scotiniotisa

aDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece; b1st Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon Hospital, Athens, Greece

* Corresponding author.

 

Keywords: Complications, Pancreas, Pseudocyst drainage

Palavras-Chave: Complicações, Pâncreas, Drenagem de pseudoquisto

 

A 45-year-old man with a symptomatic 14-cm-sized pancreatic body pseudocyst following alcohol-induced acute pancreatitis 19 months earlier was treated with placement of a lumen-apposing metal stent. The stent (Hot Axios, Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA) had a length of 1 cm and a diameter of 10 mm and was inserted under endosonographic guidance. The patient experienced immediate relief of symptoms and imaging studies confirmed the complete resolution of the pseudocyst. Endoscopy 11 weeks later revealed epithelial overgrowth of its gastric flange (Fig. 1), though the stent was visible within the gastrocystic fistula (Fig. 2). Stent removal by means of a rat-tooth forceps was performed, but necessitated significant maneuvering in order the gastric flange to be released. No procedure-related complications were encountered. Thus, the recommended 8-week period for lumen-apposing stent removal should not be significantly exceeded, to prevent a “buried stent” syndrome secondary to epithelial overgrowth at its gastric end [1–3].

 

 

 

 

References

1 Bang JY, Hasan M, Navaneethan U, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S: Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) for pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) drainage: may not be business as usual. Gut 2017;66:2054–2056.         [ Links ]

2 Rodrigues-Pinto E, Grimm IS, Baron TH: Removal of buried gastroduodenal stents after drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: Silence of the LAMS (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2016;83:853–854.         [ Links ]

3 Patil R, Ona MA, Papafragkakis C, Anand S, Duddempudi S: Endoscopic ultrasoundguided placement of AXIOS stent for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. Ann Gastroenterol 2016;29:168–173.         [ Links ]

 

Disclosure Statement

All authors confirm that there is no conflict regarding this publication.

 

* Corresponding author.

Dr. Athanasios D. Sioulas

Department of Gastroenterology, Hygeia Hospital

4 Erythrou Stavrou Street and Kifissias Avenue

GR–15123 Athens (Greece)

E-Mail athsioulas@yahoo.gr

 

Received: December 11, 2017; Accepted after revision: January 9, 2018

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons