SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.5 número2A mensagem nas eleições presidenciais portuguesas: os cartazes e slogans entre 1976 e 2006Banal journalism or a crash between agency and professional norms: Considerations around mainstream journalism covering dramatic events índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Observatorio (OBS*)

versão On-line ISSN 1646-5954

OBS* v.5 n.2 Lisboa  2011

 

Queer theory and change.

Towards a pragmatic approach to resistance and subversion in media research on gay and lesbian identities

 

Sander De Ridder*, Frederik Dhaenens**, Sofie Van Bauwel***

* Ghent University, Belgium

** Ghent University, Belgium

*** Ghent University, Belgium

 

Abstract

This paper wants to challenge the tendency in media studies on gay and lesbian identities to remain within two dominant paradigms: the essentialist or the post-structuralist traditions. Consequently, we will elaborate on the question: if media research emphasizes social change, should it mainly adopt a political and strategic identity claim which refers to essentialism, or, should it acknowledge discourses as more important, and therefore use post-structural and queer theoretical insights? Since we discuss the case of gay and lesbian identities, we will focus on possible resistance in popular culture, which mainly involves offering alternatives to the continuous representation of heteronormativity.

We will argue that for social change to occur, there needs to be a symbiosis between agency and structure. To this end, a dialectic approach is needed that bridges the gaps between, on the one hand, a post-structuralist project that creates awareness of norms, discourse and hegemony, and on the other, identity politics that have the potential to change laws and institutions.

This paper will offer a mainly theoretical exploration and will use illustrations from popular media culture with a focus on television. To this end, this paper will illustrate how LGBT-targeted television channels employ the discussed strategies of resistance.

Keywords: media studies – essentialism – queer theory – resistance

 

Full text only available in PDF format.

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

 

References

Aaron, M. (2009). Towards queer television theory. Bigger pictures sans the sweet queer-after. In G. Davis & G. Needham (Eds.), Queer TV. Theories, histories, politics (pp. 63-75). New York: Routledge

Amy-Chinn, D. (2005). Queering the bitch. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 8(3), 313-328.        [ Links ]

Avila-Saavedra, G. (2009). Nothing queer about queer television: televized construction of gay masculinities. Media, Culture & Society, 31(1), 5-21.

Battles, K., & Hilton-Morrow, W. (2002). Gay characters in conventional spaces: Will and Grace and the situation comedy genre. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19(1), 87 - 105.

Berlant, L., & Warner, M. (1995). What Does Queer Theory Teach Us about X? Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 110(3), 343-349.

Bernstein, M. (2002). Identities and Politics: Toward a Historical Understanding of the Lesbian and Gay Movement. Social Science History, 26(3), 531-581.

Best, B. (1998). Over-the-counter-culture: Theorizing resistance in popular culture. In S. Redhead, D. Wynne & J. O'Connor (Eds.), The Clubcultures Reader: Readings in Popular Cultural Studies (pp. 18-35). London: Blackwell.

Brubaker, R., & Cooper, F. (2000). Beyond "identity". Theory and society, 29(1), 1-47.

Buckingham, D. (2007). Introducing identity. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity and digital media. Cambridge: MIT press.

Butler, J. (1999). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.

Chambers, S. A. (2003). Telepistemology of the Closet; or, The Queer Politics of Six Feet Under. The Journal of American Culture, 26(1), 24-41.

Chambers, S. A. (2006). Heteronormativity and the L Word. From a politics of representation to a politics of norms. In K. Akass & J. Mccabe (Eds.), Reading the L Word. Outing in contemporary television. New York: I.B. Tauris.

Chambers, S. A., & Carver, T. (2008). Judith Butler and political theory: troubling politics. New York: Routledge.

Davis, G., & Needham, G. (2009). Introduction. The pleasures of the tube. In G. Davis & G. Needham (Eds.), Queer TV. Theories, histories, politics (pp. 1-11). New York: Routledge

De Lauretis, T. (1987). Technologies of gender. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

De Lauretis, T. (1999). Upping the anti (sic) in feminist theory. In S. During (Ed.), The cultural studies reader (pp. 307-319). London: Routledge.

Derrida, J., & Bass, A. (2003). Writing and difference. London: Routledge.

Dhaenens, F., Van Bauwel, S., & Biltereyst, D. (2008). Slashing the Fiction of Queer Theory: Slash Fiction, Queer Reading, and Transgressing the Boundaries of Screen Studies, Representations, and Audiences. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 32(4), 335-347.

Doty, A. (1995). There's something queer here. In A. Doty & C. Creekmur (Eds.), Out in culture: gay, lesbian, and queer essays on popular culture. Durham: Duke University Press.

Durham, M., & Kellner, D. (Eds.). (2006). Media and cultural studies : Keyworks Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Dyer, R. (2002). The culture of queers. London: Routledge.

Featherstone, M. (1995). Undoing Culture. Globalization, Postmodernism and Identity. California: Thousand Oaks.

Fenton, N. (2000). The problematics of postmodernism for feminist media studies. Media, Culture & Society, 22(6), 723-741.

Fiske, J. (1989). Understanding popular culture. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality, Vol1. London: Penguin.

Foucault, M., & Gordon, C. (1980). Power and knowledge. New York: Prentice-Hall.

Foucault, M., & Sheridan, A. (1977). Discipline and punish. New York: Pantheon books.

Fuss, D. (1990). Essentially speaking. New York: Routledge.

Gauntlett, D. (2008). Media, gender and identity. London: Routledge.

Giddens, A. (1994). Modernity and Self - Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

GLAAD (2010a). Mission Statement Retrieved June 30, 2010, from http://www.glaad.org/mission

GLAAD (2010b). Where We Are on TV Report, retrieved June 30, 2010, from http://www.glaad.org/tvreport

Gramsci, A., Fulchignoni, P., & Paris, R. (1978). Cahiers de prison. Paris: Gallimard.

Gross, L. (2007). Gideon Who Will be 25 in the Year 2012: Growing Up Gay Today. International Journal of Communication, 1(1), 121-138. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/55/21

Hall, S. (2003). Representation. London: Sage.

Halperin, D. M. (1995). Saint = Foucault. Towards a gay hagiography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Halperin, D. M. (2003). The Normalization of Queer Theory. Journal of Homosexuality, 45(2), 339 - 343.

Hart, K. (2000). Representing gay men on American television. Journal of Men's Studies, 9(1), 59-79.

Jenkins, R. (2008). Social Identity. London: Routledge.

Jones, A. (2004). We're Here, we're... Advocate, 52-52.

Kerry, S. (2009). "There's Genderqueers on the Starboard Bow": The Pregnant Male in Star Trek. The Journal of Popular Culture, 42(4), 699-714.

Kirsch, M. (2000). Queer Theory and Social Change. London: Routledge.

Lacroix, C., & Westerfelhaus, R. (2005). From the Closet to the Loft: Liminal License and Socio-Sexual Separation in Queer eye for the straight guy. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 6(1), 11 - 19.

Mouffe, C. (1995). Feminism, citizenship, and radical democratic politics. In L. Nicholson & S. Seidman (Eds.), Social postmodernism (pp. 315-313). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Plummer, K. (2005). Critical humanism and queer theory. Living with the tensions. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research. California: Thousand oaks.

Seckler, V. (2004, May 26th ). Logo: I want my gay TV. Women's Wear Daily, 187, 12-12.

Sedgwick, E. K. (1985). Between men. New York: Columbia university press.

Sedgwick, E. K. (1990). Epistemology of the Closet. California: University of California press.

Seidman, S. (1997). Difference troubles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shugart, H. A. (2003). Reinventing Privilege: The New (Gay) Man in Contemporary Popular Media. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 20(1), 67 - 91.

Stanley, A. (2005, September 1st ). Gay Cable’s Like Straight, Except for Nervous Jokes. The New York Times. Retrieved September 14th 2010, from http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/01/arts/television/01watc.html

Stein, A., & Plummer, K. (1995). "I can't even think straight": "queer" theory and the missing sexual revolution in sociology In S. Seidman (Ed.), Queer theory/sociology (pp. 129-143). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Streitmatter, R. (2009). From 'perverts' to 'fab five'. The media's changing Depiction of Gay Men and Lesbians. London: Routledge.

Van Zoonen, L. (1994). Feminist media studies California: Thousand Oaks.

Viacom (2008). About Logo TV, retrieved September 14th, 2010, from http://www.logotv.com/about/

Ward, J., & Schneider, B. (2009). The Reaches of Heteronormativity: An Introduction. Gender Society, 23(4), 433-439.

Warner, M. (1991). Introduction: Fear of a Queer Planet. Social Text, 29, 3-17.

Warner, M. (1999). The trouble with the normal. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Weeks, J. (1996). The Construction of Homosexuality. In S. Seidman (Ed.), Queer theory/Sociology (pp. 41-62). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

Westerfelhaus, R., & Lacroix, C. (2006). Seeing “Straight” through Queer Eye: Exposing the Strategic Rhetoric of Heteronormativity in a Mediated Ritual of Gay Rebellion. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 23(5), 426 - 444.

Wittig, M. (1992). The straight mind and other essays. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons