SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número11A Reestruturação do Modelo Nórdico de EducaçãoProgressão continuada: por que a revisão dos ciclos? índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista Lusófona de Educação

versão impressa ISSN 1645-7250

Rev. Lusófona de Educação  n.11 Lisboa  2008

 

Mercado, performance, accountability. Duas décadas de retórica reaccionária na educação

Romuald Normand*

 

 

A performance e a eficácia instituíram-se como prioridade das actuais políticas de educação. Quais os motivos que levaram à sua afirmação como paradigma dos sistemas educativos em detrimento da escola compreensiva? O presente artigo visa reconstituir e questionar a construção das teses fundamentais que contribuíram para a denúncia da crise generalizada da escola compreensiva e o aparecimento do modelo de escola eficaz, capaz de se integrar num mercado concorrencial e globalizado, no quadro de uma retórica reaccionária, instalada nos últimos vinte anos nos EUA e no Reino Unido e que se vem alargando à escala global. Pretende-se, desta forma, suscitar a reflexão sobre o papel dos sociólogos da educação na compreensão da interacção dos vários agentes educativos a uma escala globalizada e das novas implicações do capitalismo nas políticas educativas.

Palavras-chave: Mercado; performance; accountability; school effectiveness: agenda neoconservadora

 

 

Market, performance, accountability. Two decades of reactionary rhetoric in education

Performance and efficiency stand as priorities in present educational politics. Which were the reasons that led them to be the paradigm of educatinal systems replacing the comprehensive education? The following paper aims at rebuild and question the fundamental thesis that contributed to the evidence of a generalized crisis in the comprehensive education and the appearance of the model of efficient school, capable of taking part in a concurrent and global market, framed by a reactionary rhethoric, installed in USA and in the United Kingdom in the past twenty years, and developping at a global scale. It is also the aim of this paper to reflect over the role of the sociologists in education in the understanding of the interaction among various educational agents at a global scale and the new implications of capitalism in educational politics.

Keywords: Market; performance; accountability; school effectiveness; neo-conservative agenda.

 

 

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text only available in PDF format.

 

 

Referências bibliográficas

Apple, M. W. (2001). Educating the “right” way : markets, standards, God, and inequality, New York & London : Routledge Falmer,2001.

Baudelot, C & Leclercq, F. (dir.) (2005), Les effets de l’éducation. Rapport à l’intention du PIREF, Paris : La documentation française.

Beck, U. (2003). Pouvoir et contre-pouvoir à l’ère de la mondialisation, Paris : Flammarion.

Berliner, D. C. & Biddle, B. J.(1995). The manufactured crisis : myths, fraud, and the attack on America’s public schools, Cambridge (Mass.) : Perseus books.

Boltanski, L. & Chiappello, E. (1999). Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme, Paris : Gallimard.

Bottani, N. (2006). Les enjeux d’une évaluation de la qualité de l’enseignement par les indicateurs. In R. Normand (coord.) De la formation à l’emploi : des politiques à l’épreuve de la qualité, Bruxelles: De Boeck-INRP.

Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. & Barthe, Y. (2001). Agir dans un monde incertain: essai sur la démocratie technique, Paris : Seuil.

Chateauraynaud, F. & Torny, D. (1999). Les sombres précurseurs. Une sociologie pragmatique de l’alerte et du risque, Paris: EHESS.

Chitty, C. (1989). Towards a new education system: the victory of the new right?, London: The Falmer Press.

Chubb, J. E. & Moe, T.(1990). Politics, markets and America’s schools, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

Coleman, J. S., Hoffer, T. & Kilgore, S. (1981). Public and private schools (Final report to the National Center for Education Statistics), Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.

Crahay, M. (2000). L’école peut-elle être juste et efficace? De l’égalité des chances à l’égalité des acquis, Bruxelles: De Boeck université.

Denham, A. (1996). Think-tanks of the New Right, London & Aldershot : Brookfield.

Derouet, J.-L. (1992). Ecole et justice. De l’égalité des chances aux compromis locaux, Paris ; Métailié.

Dubet, F. (2004). L’école des chances : qu’est-ce qu’une école juste?, Paris, Seuil.

Goastellec, G. (2003). Le SAT et l’accès aux études supérieures : le recrutement des élites américaines en question. Sociologie du travail, 45 (4), 473-490.

Gewirtz, S. (2002). The managerial school : post-welfarism and social justice in education, London: Routledge.

Gipps & Murphy (1994). A fair test? : assessment, achievement, and equity, Buckingham: Open University Press.

Hayek, F. (1995). La route de la servitude, Paris: PUF Quadrige.

Hayek, F. (2002). Scientisme et sciences sociales, Paris : Plon.

Hernstein, R. J. & Murray, C. (1996). The Bell curve : intelligence and class structure in American life, New York : Simon & Schuster.

Hirschman, A. O. (1991). Deux siècles de rhétorique réactionnaire, Paris: Fayard.

Lascoumes, P. & Le Galès, P. (2007). Sociologie de l’action publique, (dir. François de Singly), Paris: A. Colin.

Lehman, N. (2001). The big test. The secret history of the American meritocracy, New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.

Mannheim, K. (1956). Idéologie et utopie, Paris : Librairie Marcel Rivière et Cie.

Micklethwait, J. & Wooldridge, A. (2004). The Right Nation: conservative power in America, New York : Penguin Press.

Meuret, D. (1999). La justice du système éducatif, Bruxelles : De Boeck.

Meuret, D. (2007). Gouverner l’école : une comparaison France / Etats-Unis, Paris : PUF.

Morley & Rassol (1999) School effectiveness : fracturing the discourse, London: Falmer Press.

Normand, R. (2003a). Le mouvement de la School effectiveness  et sa critique dans le monde anglo-saxon. In A.Van Haecht (dir.) Sociologie, politique et critique en éducation, Revue de l’Institut de Sociologie (pp. 135-166). Bruxelles: ULB.

Normand, R. (2003b). Les comparaisons internationales de résultats : problèmes épistémologiques et questions de justice. Education & Sociétés, 12, 73-89.

Normand, R. (2004a). La formation tout au long de la vie et son double. Contribution à une critique de l’économie politique de l’efficacité en éducation. Education & sociétés, 13, 103-118.

Normand, R. (2006). L’école efficace ou l’horizon du monde comme laboratoire » in Revue Française de Pédagogie.

Normand, R. (2007). Les qualités de la recherche ou les enjeux du travail de la preuve en éducation. In R. Normand (coord.), De la formation à l’emploi : des politiques à l’épreuve de la qualité, Bruxelles, De Boeck-INRP.

Osborn, M., Broadfoot, P. & McNess, E. (2003). A world of difference? comparing learners across Europe, Maidenhead (GB) : Open University Press.

Osborne, M. (2007). Promouvoir la qualité : comparaisons internationales et questions méthodologiques. In R. Normand (coord.), De la formation à l’emploi : des politiques à l’épreuve de la qualité, Bruxelles : De Boeck-INRP.

Ricoeur, P. (1997). Idéologie et utopie, Paris, Seuil.

Rochex, J.-Y. (coord.) (2006). PISA : analyses secondaires, questions et débats théoriques et méthodologiques, Revue Française de Pédagogie, 157.

Seldon, A. & Kandiah, M. (1996). Ideas and thinktanks in contemporary Britain, London: Cass.

Smith, E. (2005). Raising Standards in American Schools: the case of No Child Left Behind, Journal of Education Policy, 20 (4), 507-524.

Smith, J.A. (1991). The idea brokers : thinktanksand the rise of the new policy elite, New York: Free Press.

Spring, J. (2005). Political agendas for education: from the religious right to the Green Party, Mahwah (N.J.) & London : L. Erlbaum.

Soloway, R.A. (1995). Demography and degeneration : eugenics and the declining birthrate in twentieth-century Britain, Chapel Hill & London : University of North Carolina Press.

Tomlinson, S. (2005). Education in a post-welfare society, 2a ed., Buckingham: Open University Press.

 

 

*Unité Mixte Recherches Education & Polítiques, Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique (INRP) – Université Lumière Lyon 2, romuald.normand@inrp.fr

Tradução do original em Francês de Sandra Escobar. Revisão científica de António Teodoro