SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.12 issue1Empresarialidade e empresário: Revisão da literaturaEmpreender na primeira pessoa: Uma entrevista com Artur Nunes author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Comportamento Organizacional e Gestão

Print version ISSN 0872-9662

Comport. Organ. Gest. vol.12 no.1 Lisboa  2006

 

Marketing de ideias e construção de redes: As duas vias de atracção de recursos para novos empreendimentos

 

Miguel Pereira Lopes1 *

Miguel Pina e Cunha2

Filipa Reis3

 

1Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa

2Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Faculdade de Economia

3Universidade Independente, Lisboa

 

 

Resumo. Este artigo apresenta uma abordagem para explicar o modo como os empreendedores atraem os recursos que são críticos para a criação e desenvolvimento de um novo empreendimento. Nessa abordagem, o empreendedor é concebido como um magnetizador que estabelece relações com os detentores de recursos relevantes através de duas vias possíveis: uma via directa, referente ao modo como o empreendedor procura envolver outros para o empreendimento e tenta persuadi-los a apoiar os seus esforços empreendedores; e uma via indirecta, que diz respeito aos efeitos de atracção que derivam da sua posição nas redes sociais e da legitimidade do empreendimento. A abordagem que propomos constitui um avanço nas teorias sobre empreendedorismo, na medida em que adopta uma posição de nível meso, não privilegiando nem os traços individuais de personalidade nem os cons-trangimentos socio-económico-culturais. No final, são ainda discutidas as contribuições práticas da abordagem apresentada.

Palavras-chave: Empreendedorismo, atracção de recursos, marketing de ideias, redes sociais, relações magnéticas.

 

Abstract. This article presents a framework to explain how entrepreneurs attract critical resources to venture creation and development. We conceive the entrepreneur as a magnetizer establishing relationships with relevant resource-holders through two possible routes: a direct route refering to how the entrepreneur seeks to engage others in the venture and to persuade them to support his/her entrepreneurial efforts; and an indirect route concerning the magnetic effects of his/her social network positions and venture legitimacy. The framework ads to entrepreneurship theory by adopting a meso-level stance which privileges neither the individual personality traits, nor the macro socio-economic-cultural constraints. Practical contributions are discussed in the end of the article.

Key words: Entrepreneurship, resource attraction, idea selling, social networks, magnetic relationships.

 

 

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text only available in PDF format.

 

 

Referências

Aldrich, H., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19 (4), 645-670.         [ Links ]

Aldrich, H., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In D. L. Sexton & R. W. Smilor (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship (pp. 3-23). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

Alvarez, S., & Barney, J. (2001). How entrepreneurial firms can benefit from alliances with larger partners. Academy of Management Executive, 15 (1), 139-148.

Ames, C. B. (1989). How to devise a winning business plan. The Journal of Business Strategy, 10, 30-36.

Aristotle (1952). On the Soul. Translated by J. A. Smith. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Brittanica.

Audia, P. G., & Rider, C. I. (2005). A garage and an idea: What more does an entrepreneur need?. California Management Review, 48 (1), 6-28.

Baron, R. A. (2002). OB and entrepreneurship: The reciprocal benefits of closer conceptual links. In L. L. Cummings, & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 24, pp. 225-269). Greenwich: JAI Press.

Baron, R. A., & Markman, G. D. (2000). Beyond social capital: How social skills can enhance entrepreneurs’ success. Academy of Management Executive, 14 (1), 106-117.

Baum, J. R., & Locke, E. A. (2004). The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (4), 587-598.

Bird, B., & Brush, C. (2003). What is Entrepreneurial Vision and How Does it Work? (WP: 2003-19). Boston: Boston University, School of Management.

Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (1998). What makes an entrepreneur? Journal of Labor Economics, 16 (1), 26-60.

Brush, C. G., Greene, P. G., & Hart, M. M. (2001). From initial idea to unique advantage. The entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base. Academy of Management Executive, 15 (1), 64-80.

Burt, R. S. (2000). The Network Structure of Social Capital. In L. L. Cummings, & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 22, pp. 345-423). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Busenitz, L., Gómez, C., & Spencer, J. (2000). Country Institutional Profiles: Unlocking Entrepreneurial Phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5), 994-1003.

Bygrave W. D. (1993). Theory Building in the Entrepreneurship Paradigm. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 255-280.

Cameron, K., & Caza, A. (2004). Contributions to the Discipline of Positive Organizational Scholarship. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 731-739.

Cooper, A. C., Woo, C. Y., & Dunkelberg, D. C. (1988). Entrepreneurs’ Perceived Chances for Success. Journal of Business Venturing, 3, 97-108.

Crant, J. M. (1996). The proactive personality scale as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 34 (3), 42-49.

Cross, R., & Parker, A. (2004). The hidden power of social networks: Understanding how work really gets done in organizations. Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Good Business: Flow, Leadership and the Making of Meaning. New York: Viking.

Dutton, J. (2003). Energize Your Workplace: How to create and sustain high-quality connections at work. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Dutton, J., & Ashford, S. J. (1993). Selling issues to top management. Academy of Management Review, 18 (3), 397-428.

Dutton, J., Ashford, S. J., O Neal, R. M., & Lawrence, K. A. (2001). Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 44 (4), 716-737.

Formaini, R. L. (2001). The engine of capitalist process: Entrepreneurs in economic theory. Economic & Financial Review, 4, 2-11.

Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10 (4), 696-706.

Gartner, W. B., & Low, L. (199). Trust as an organizing troop. Comunicação apresentada no Annual meeting of the Academy of Management, San Francisco.

Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak tie. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.

Hackman, J. R. (2003). Learning more by crossing levels: evidence from airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24 (8), 905-922.

Harrison, T. L. (2005). Instinct: Tapping your entrepreneurial DNA to achieve your business goals. New York: Warner Business Books.

House, R., Rousseau, D. M., & Thomas-Hunt, M. (1995). The meso paradigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior. In L. L. Cummings, & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 71-114). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Jensen, S. M., & Luthans, F. (2002). The impact of hope in the entrepreneurial process: Exploratory research findings. Trabalho não publicado.

Johannisson, B. (2000). Networking and Entrepreneurial Growth. In D. Sexton, & H. Landström (Eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship (pp. 368-386). London: Blackwell.

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33 (4), 692-724.

Katila, R., & Shane, S. (2005). When does lack of resources make new forms innovative? Academy of Management Journal, 48 (5), 814-829.

Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19 (2), 195-229.

Klein, K. J., Cannella, A., & Tosi, H. (1999). Multilevel theory: Challenges and contributions. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2), 243-248.

Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein, & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90). Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Frontiers Series. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. Edited by D. Cartwright. New York: Harper & Row.

Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and linking it to Performance. Academy of Management Review, 21 (1), 135-172.

McClelland, D. C., & Winter, D. G. (1969). Motivating Economic Achievement. New York: Free Press.

MacMillan, I. C. (1983). The Politics of New Venture Management. Harvard Business Review, 61 (6), 8-16.

Martin, J. L. (2003). What is field theory? The American Journal of Sociology, 109 (1), 1-49.

May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety, and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11-37.

McFarling, B. (2000). Schumpeter’s Entrepreneurs and Commons’s Sovereign Authority. Journal of Economic Issues, 34 (3), 707-721.

Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23 (2), 242-266.

Newbert, S. L. (2005). New firm formation: A dynamic capability perspective. Journal of Small Business Management, 43 (1), 55-77.

Ostgaard, T. A., & Birley, S. (1996). New Venture Growth and Personal Networks. Journal of Business Research, 36 (1), 37-50.

Renzuli, L. A., & Aldrich, H. (2005). Who can you turn to? Tie activation within core business discussion networks. Social Forces, 84 (1), 323-341.

Rich, S. R., & Gumpert, D. E. (1985). How to write a winning business plan. Harvard Business Review, 3, 3-8.

Ring, P. S., Bigley, G. A., D’Aunno, T., & Khanna, T. (2005). Perspectives on how governments matter. Academy of Management Review, 30 (2), 308-320.

Rousseau, D. M. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research. In L. L. Cummings, & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 1-38). Greenwich: JAI Press.

Rousseau, D. M., & House, R. J. (1994). Meso organizational behavior: Avoiding three fundamental biases. Trends in Organizational Behavior, 1, 13-30.

Ruef, M., Aldrich, H. E., & Carter, N. M. (2003). The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. American Sociological Review, 68 (2), 195-222.

Sagie, A., & Elizur, D. (1999). Achievement motive and entrepreneurial orientation: A structural analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 375-387.

Schumpeter, J. (1961). The Theory of Economic Development. New York: Oxford University Press (reedição da 1.ª edição de 1934).

Shane, S., & Cable, D. (2002). Network Ties, Reputation, and the Financing of New Ventures. Management Science, 48 (3), 364-381.

Shane, S., Locke, E. A., & Collins, C. J. (2003). Entrepreneurial Motivation. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 257-279.

Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational Endowments and the Performance of University Start-ups. Management Science, 48 (1), 154-170.

Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), 217-226.

Shook, C. L., Priem, R. L., & McGee, J. E. (2003). Venture creation and the enterprising individual. Journal of Management, 29 (3), 379-399.

Smircich, L., & Stubbart, C. (1985). Strategic Management in the enacted world. Academy of Management Review, 10 (4), 724-736.

Smith-Doerr, L., Manev, I. M., & Rizova, P. (2004). The meaning of success: Network position and the social construction of project outcomes in an R&D lab. Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 21, 51-81.

Starr, J., & McMillan, I. (1990). Resource cooptation via social contracting: Resource acquisition strategies for new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 79-92.

Steensma, K., Marino, L., Weaver, M., & Dickson, P. (2000). The influence of national culture on the formation of technology alliances by entrepreneurial firms. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5), 951-973.

Stewart, W. H., Carland, J. C., Carland, J. W., Watson, W. E., & Sweo, R. (2003). Entrepreneurial dispositions and goal orientations: A comparative exploration of united states and russian entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 41 (1), 27-46.

Stuart, T. E. (2000). Interorganizational Alliances and the Performance of Firms: A Study of Growth and Innovation Rates in a High-Technology Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (8), 791-811.

Thompson, J. L. (2004). The facets of the entrepreneur: Identifying entrepreneurial potential. Management Decision, 42 (2), 243-258.

Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Wang, C. K., & Ang, B. L. (2004). Determinants of venture performance in Singapore. Journal of Small Business Management, 42 (4), 347-363.

Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Massachusetts: Addison Wesley.

Yang, H. (2004). Leveraging social networks to cultivate entrepreneurial orientation: An organizational embeddedness perspective. In Proceedings of the Miswest Academy of Management Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

 

 

* Endereço: Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Rua Jardim do Tabaco, 4, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal.

E-mail: mlopes@ispa.pt

Este artigo foi realizado com o suporte duma bolsa atribuída ao primeiro autor pela Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Ministério da Ciência e do Ensino Superior, SFRH/BD/18113/2004.