SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.37 issue4Detection of Catechol using a Biosensor Based on Biosynthesized Silver nanoparticles and Polyphenol Oxidase Enzymes author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Portugaliae Electrochimica Acta

Print version ISSN 0872-1904

Port. Electrochim. Acta vol.37 no.4 Coimbra Aug. 2019

http://dx.doi.org/10.4152/pea.201904271 

ARTIGOS

Electrochemical Behaviour of 4-Tertbutylcyclohexanone Semicarbazone and its Co(II) Complex 

 

Lakshmi Meena, Preeti Choudhary, A.K. Varshney and S. Varshney  

Department of Chemistry, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur-302004, India

 

ENDEREÇO PARA CORRESPONDÊNCIA

 

ABSTRACT

The electrochemical behaviour of 4-tertbutylcyclohexanone semicarbazone (TBCHSC) and its Co(II) complex was investigated by a glassy carbon electrode, cyclic voltammetry technique. Semicarbazone synthesized from the condensation of 4-tertbutylcyclohexanone and semicarbazide hydrochloride (1:1 molar ratio) was further treated with cobalt(II) acetate (2:1 molar ratio), to form the Co(II)-semicarbazone complex. The semicarbazone was studied in buffer solutions (Britton-Robinson universal buffer and phosphate buffer), with a pH in the range of 3 to 11. The reduction process was found to be irreversible and diffusion controlled, for both semicarbazone and its Co(II) complex. The effects of change on the sweep rate, concentration, pH and solvent were evaluated. The semicarbazone reduction mechanism was suggested on the basis of the obtained results. Kinetic parameters, such as charge transfer coefficient (αn), diffusion coefficient (D01/2), and rate constant (k°f,h), were calculated from cyclic voltammetric measurements. Semicarbazone and its Co(II) complex were tested against bacterial and fungal species. The metal complex had higher activity than the free ligand.

Keywords: 4-tertbutylcyclohexanone semicarbazone, Co(II) complex, cyclic voltammetry, kinetic parameters, antimicrobial activities.

 

Introduction

The electrochemical technique is one of the greener, more economic, specific and selective approaches [1-2]. Electrochemical reactions are most often studied with standard three electrode techniques, such as cyclic voltammetry, polarography, etc. Cyclic voltammetry has gained extensive use in providing information about the reduction, oxidation and formation of intermediates, and also on the reversible nature of the electrode transfer processes. Cyclic voltammograms provide valuable information regarding electrode processes [3-4]. Semicarbazones are amongst the most widely studied nitrogen and oxygen/sulphur donor ligands. They have been a subject of interest in recent decades, due to their biological activity, good complexing properties and analytical applications [5-9]. Systematic perusal of earlier literature reveals that, in spite of the variegated importance associated to semicarbazones compounds, relatively few reports exist on their electrochemical behaviour [10-16]. Hence, efforts have been made to undertake cyclic voltammetric studies on 4-tertbutylcyclohexanone semicarbazone (TBCHSC). In this process, TBCHSC’s imine group (-C=N-) has been reduced into the amine group (-CH-NH2), in a protic solvent such as CH3OH, by the transfer of 4e- [17-18]. In this paper synthesis, spectral analysis, cyclic voltammetric and antimicrobial activity studies of TBCHSC and its Co(II) complex have been carried out.

 

Experimental

All employed chemicals were of analytical grade. Methanol was freshly distilled prior to use. IR spectra were acquired using an A-8400 S, Shimadzu Spectrophotometer model, and KBr optics.

Ligand synthesis

Semicarbazone was synthesized mixing 4-tertbutylcyclohexanone, semicarbazide hydrochloride and sodium acetate trihydrated (equimolar ratio) in methanol (Scheme I). TBCHSC was synthesized by the standard procedure, as available in the literature [19-20].

 

 

Synthesis of the complex

The TBCHSC cobalt complex was synthesized in a methanolic solution of TBCHSC, by mixing it with a methanolic solution of Co(II) acetate (2:1 molar ratio), refluxing the mixture for 5 hours, and drying it in vacuum over fused CaCl2 (Scheme II).

 

 

Cyclic voltammetric study of TBCHSC and its Co(II) complex

Semicarbazone’s stock solutions (1×10-2 M) in dimethylformamide (AR) and methanol were prepared. Britton-Robinson and phosphate buffers were prepared in double distilled water. In the typical cyclic voltammetric experiment, a reaction mixture consists of a compound solution, solvent (the minimum volume necessary to keep the compound in the solution) and a buffer solution (keeping the overall volume constant at 10 mL).

The stock solution of the complex was prepared in alcohol and DMF. 1 M NaClO4 was prepared in double distilled water, and used as supporting electrolyte. The working solution was prepared by taking 1 mL of the stock solution (0.01 M) of the complex and 1 mL of the supporting electrolyte solution (1 M NaClO4 ). The final solution was made up to 10.0 mL, by adding alcohol or DMF to get 1 mM concentration of the experimental solution.

A stream of nitrogen gas was passed over the reaction mixture. The three electrodes (glassy carbon electrode-working electrode, Ag/AgCl-reference electrode and a Pt wire-auxiliary electrode) were connected to the electrochemical cell. Required scan rates, current sensitivity, initial potential and final potential were applied, and the resulting current was measured as a function of the applied potential.

The electrochemical reduction behaviour of the synthesized TBCHSC was studied on a glassy carbon electrode in DMF and CH3OH media, using phosphate and B-R buffers, at various sweep rates, pH values and electroactive species concentrations. The compound exhibited one irreversible reduction peak in the cathodic direction. Thus, kinetic parameters, such as charge-transfer coefficient (αn), diffusion coefficient (D01/2) and rate constant (K°f,h) were calculated for an irreversible and diffusion controlled reduction, by using the following equations [21-24]:

Most of the cyclic voltammograms were recorded with an initial potential (Ei) value of +500 and a switching potential value (Es) of -1100 mV for semicarbazone. For the complex, the Ei value was + 500 and the Es value was -1000 mV, at the scan rates of 50-250 mV/sec. The various parameters employed to evaluate the electrochemical reversibility are listed in Tables 1 to 6.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Antimicrobial studies

In vitro antibacterial activity of the compounds was studied against gram positive and gram negative bacterial strains, by the agar well diffusion method. Mueller Hinton agar no. 2 was used as bacteriological medium. The antifungal activity of the experimental compounds was investigated by the agar well diffusion method. The yeasts and saprophytic fungi were sub cultured onto Sabouraud’s dextrose agar (SDA) (Merck, Germany). The activity index was calculated by the standard zone of inhibition [25-28].

 

Results and discussion

Cyclic voltammetry studies

The cyclic voltammetric results for semicarbazone are given in Tables 1 to 4, and its voltammograms are depicted in Figs. 1 to 4.

 

 

 

 

 

The cyclic voltammetric results for the complex are presented in Tables 1 to 6, and its voltammograms are displayed in Figs. 5 to 6.

 

 

 

The cyclic voltammograms were recorded by varying the scan rate, keeping the pH and the solution concentration constant; the data exhibited one irreversible reduction peak at all scan rates. The peak potential value shifted towards the more negative direction, with an increase in the scan rate, indicating that the electrochemical process was irreversible (Fig. 8). The peak current was also increased as the scan rate increased for the compounds. The linear nature of the Ipc v/s ν1/2 plot, with an intercept different of zero, showed that TBCHSC reduction was diffusion controlled (Fig. 7).

 

 

 

The concentration effect on the reduction potential was studied by varying the compound concentration from 1 mM to 4 mM, keeping the scan rate constant. The cathodic peak current was found to linearly increase with an increase in the compound concentration. The plot of Ipc vs. concentration showed linearity, further indicating that the electrode process was diffusion controlled. It was also observed that the peak potential (Epc) shifted towards more negative values, as the compound concentration increased (Table 4). This Epc shifts in the cathodic direction, with an increasing concentration, indicated that the reduction products were adsorbed onto the electrode surface; this kind of shift has been theoretically predicted and experimentally observed [29-30].

The pH effect upon TBCHSC reduction was investigated (Tables 1 to 3, and Fig. 8). The peak potential values of the compounds were found to change with the solution’s pH value. This dependence of the peak potential on the pH indicates that the proton transfer took place during the electrode reaction. The peak potential shifts towards more negative values depended upon the solution’s pH. This meant that the reduction was easier in acidic media, and difficult in media where the proton concentration was low. The ease of reduction was found to be greater in an acidic pH than in an alkaline pH, which might be because of the formation of an easily reducible protonated intermediate.

Cyclic voltammograms were recorded in two different media: a DMF-phosphate buffer and a CH3OH-phosphate buffer. It was observed that the peak potential shifted towards more negative values in the presence of an aprotic solvent (DMF), and the shift magnitude depended on the solvent nature. The shift order observed in the present study was DMF-phosphate > CH3OH-phosphate buffer. This trend paralleled the trend observed in the solvent viscosity (DMF 0.796 > methanol 0.544).

In this process, the imine group (-C=N-) 4-tertbutylcyclohexanone semicarbazone was reduced into the amine group (-CH-NH2), in a protic solvent such as CH3OH. Since all steps involved in the reaction mechanism took place at the same potential, it occurred a single reduction peak corresponding to the transfer of four electrons (Scheme III).

 

 

In the case of the complex, no anodic peak appeared, indicating the irreversible nature of the electrode process [31]. The electrode nature was also confirmed from the peak potential value that shifted towards the more negative direction, with an increase in the scan rate. The peak current also increased as the scan rate increased for the compounds. The effect of the concentration on the reduction potential was studied by varying the compound concentration from 1 mM to 4 mM, keeping the scan rate constant. It was observed that the peak potential (Epc) shifted towards more negative values, and the cathodic peak current was found to linearly increase as the compound concentration increased. It was also observed that the peak potential shifted to more negative values in the presence of an aprotic solvent, and the shift magnitude depended on the solvent nature (Tables 5 to 6). If the reduction of the Co(II) complex and that of the ligand in alcoholic acidic pH were to be compared, it would be observed that the former would be more difficult than the latter, suggesting that the ligand reduction was proton dependant.

Infrared study

The absence of a υ(C=O) band (1745 cm-1) of ketone, and the presence of a υ(C=N) band occurred [32] at 1622-1632 cm-1 in the ligand spectra, indicated condensation between the ketonic group and the amino group of semicarbazide. In comparison with the semicarbazone spectra, the Co(II) complex exhibited the ν(C=N) band in the 1590–1603 cm1 region, showing the band shift to lower wave numbers, and indicating that the nitrogen was coordinated to the metal ion. The υ(C=O) band disappearance at 1700 ± 100 cm-1 (initially present in the semicarbazone spectra), in the Co(II) complex spectra, indicated that the participation of ketonic oxygen resulted in a bond formation. The appearance of new bands in the 579–560 and 386-322 cm-1 regions assignable to υM-O and υM-N, respectively, reflected the bonding of the metal ions to oxygen and nitrogen atoms [33-36].

Elemental analysis

This section deals with the elemental (CHNO) analysis of the ligand and its complex (Table 7).

 

 

Antimicrobial studies

This section deals with the recent biological studies of semicarbazone and its cobalt(II) metal complex. The results of the antifungal study of TBCHSC and its Co(II) complex on Fusarium oxysporium, Trichoderma reesei (Table 8) and on Gram positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis) and Gram negative bacteria (Escherichia coli) are recorded in Table 9. From Tables 8 to 9, it is clear that the inhibition was much larger for the metal complex than for semicarbazone.

 

 

 

Conclusion

From the electrochemical studies, it was concluded that the semicarbazone reduction and its Co(II) complex is irreversible. Keeping in view the feasibility of the reduction site, and on the basis of cyclic voltammetric results, the reduction mechanism shown in the Scheme III may be suggested for the electro reduction of 4-tertbutylcyclohexanone semicarbazones, similar to that reported in the literature [21-24]. The mechanism finds support from the Epc and Ep1/2 shifts towards the negative potential, with pH, as protons are consumed in the reduction. The antimicrobial activity of the complex is higher in comparison to semicarbazone, which indicates that metallation increases biological activity.

 

References

  1. Mamatha GP, Sherigara BS, Mahadevan KM. Indian J Chem Tech. 2007; 14(6): 566-571.
  2. Jayadevappa H, Shivraj Y, Mahadevan KM, et al. Indian J Chem Tech. 2006; 13(3): 269-277.
  3. Zuman P, Barns B, Rovolova A. Discuss Faraday Soc. 1968; 45: 202
  4. Schultz HP, Popp FD. Chem Rev. 1962; 62(1): 19-40.
  5. Garcia-Tojal J, Lezama L, Pizarro JL, et al. Polyhedron. 1999; 18: 3703.
  6. Mishra D, Naskar S, Drew MGB, et al. Inorg Chimica Acta. 2006; 359: 585.
  7. Mulleiz E, Fontecave M. Coord Chem Rev. 1999; 185: 775.
  8. Perez-Rebolledo A, Piro OE, Castellano EE, et al. J Mol Struct. 2006; 794: 18.
  9. Casas JS, Garcia-Tasende MS, Sordo J. Coord Chem Rev. 2000; 209: 197.
  10. Goyal RN, Minocha A. J Indian Chem Soc. 1985; 62: 202.
  11. Sangtyani R, Kumar V, Meena RC, et al. Int J Chem Tech Res. 2012; 4: 180.
  12. Mishra AK, Gode KD. Analyst. 1985; 110: 1373.
  13. Reddy BB, Sreedhar NY, Reddy SJ. Indian J Chem. 1991; 30A: 119.
  14. Kumar BGK, Sankar TR, Ramana PV, et al. Bull Electrochem. 2006; 22: 269.
  15. Pessoa MMB, Andrade GFS, Santos MR, et al. J Electroanal Chem. 2003; 545: 117.
  16. Kitaev YuP, Budnikov GK, Troepol’skaya TV, et al. Zhurnal Obshchei Khimii. 1967; 37: 1437.
  17. Lund H. Acta Chem Scand. 1959; 13: 249.
  18. Soucaze-Guillous B, Lund H. J Electroanal Chem. 1997; 423: 109.
  19. Sangtyani R, Rawat J, Verma PS, et al. J Indian Chem Soc. 2011; 88: 1553.
  20. Reddy KH, Reddy PS, Babu PR. Transit Met Chem. 2000; 25: 154.
  21. Sharma P, Kumar A, Sharma M. Indian J Chem. 2006; 45A: 872.
  22. Bard AJ, Faulkner LR. Electrochemical Methods, Fundamentals and Applications. New York:Wiley; 1980.
  23. Choudhary P, Sharma A, Varshney AK, e al. J Indian Chem Soc. 2017; 94: 613-622.
  24. Noel M, Vasu KI. Cyclic Voltammetry and the Frontiers of Electrochemistry. New Delhi:Oxford and IBH Publishing Co Pvt Ltd; 1990.
  25. Kamal R, Elixir Appl Botany. 2012; 46: 8487-8489.
  26. Ashokvardhan T, Rajithasri AB, Prathyusha P, et al. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2014; 3(4): 894-903.
  27. Tangh HA, Wang LF, Yang RD. Transit Met Chem. 2003; 28(4): 395-398.
  28. Costa RFF, Rebolledo AP, Matencio T. J Coord Chem. 2005; 58(15): 1307-1319.
  29. Nicholson RS, Shain I. Anal Chem. 1994; 36: 722.
  30. Adam RN. Electrochemistry at Solid Electrodes. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1996.
  31. Kulkarni AD, Patil SA, Badami PS. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2009; 4: 717.
  32. Noel M, Anantharaman PN. Analyst. 1985; 110: 1095.
  33. Hassaan AMA. Indian J Chem. 1997; 36: 241-243.
  34. Soliman AA, Linert W. Thermochim Acta. 1999; 333: 67-75.
  35. Nakamoto K. Infrared Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds. NewYork: Wiley-Interscience; 1970.
  36. Yadav HS, Sihag S, Varshney AK, et al.J Indian Chem Soc. 2015; 92(9): 1329-1336.

 

Received August 11, 2017; accepted January 15, 2018

 

Acknowledgements

Authors thank the Head of the Department of Chemistry for providing the necessary laboratory facilities. Ms. Lakshmi Meena is thankful to CSIR, New Delhi, for financial

 

ENDEREÇO PARA CORRESPONDÊNCIA

E-mail address:saritavarshney@rediffmail.com drsaritavarshney@gmail.com

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License