SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 issue3Kinetic Investigation of Quaternary Ni-Fe-P-C Composite Coating as a New Catalyst for Hydrogen Evolution ReactionElectrochemical Investigation of Divalent State of Praseodymium and Samarium in Non-aqueous Medium author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Portugaliae Electrochimica Acta

Print version ISSN 0872-1904

Port. Electrochim. Acta vol.33 no.3 Coimbra May 2015

https://doi.org/10.4152/pea.201503181 

Effect of Heat Treatment and Bath Process Parameters on the Corrosion Behavior of Ni-P-TiO2 Composite Coatings

Prasanna Gadhari and Prasanta Sahoo*

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700032, India

 

Abstract

The present research article deals with the study of corrosion behavior of Ni-P-TiO2 composite coating. The TiO2 composite coating is deposited on the mild steel substrate. Corrosion behavior of the TiO2 composite coatings after heat treatment at various annealing temperatures (300 °C, 400 °C, and 500 °C) is evaluated with the help of potentiodynamic polarization test using 3.5% NaCl solution. The electrochemical parameters, corrosion potential (Ecorr) and corrosion current density (Icorr), are optimized for maximum corrosion resistance using Taguchi based grey relational analysis. The coating parameters, namely, nickel sulphate, sodium hypophosphite, concentration of TiO2 particles and annealing temperature are considered as main design factors. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that the annealing temperature and concentration of TiO2 particles have significant influence on the corrosion behavior of the composite coating. The microstructure characterization of the coating is conducted using scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray analysis and X-ray diffraction analysis. The Ni-P-TiO2 composite coating exhibits nodular structure with uniform incorporation of titanium particles and converts into the crystalline structure after heat treatment.

Keywords: Ni-P-TiO2 composite coating, corrosion, potentiodynamic polarization, optimization.

 

Introduction

In industries, it is big challenge to protect the components and parts from corrosion and wear. Hence, it is essential to develop the suitable materials which have higher corrosion and wear resistance. But, it is not economical to produce such materials, which have excellent tribological properties. Deposition of additional layer on the surface of the component is the effective way to improve the mechanical and tribological properties of the component with greater economical balance. The additional layer is produced with the help of the coating. Electroless nickel (EN) coating is an autocatalytic chemical technique to deposit layer of Ni-P/Ni-B on the surface of the metal or non-metal without using electric current. The electroless nickel-phosphorus coatings have excellent corrosion and wear resistance properties [1-4]. The EN coatings with higher phosphorus content have higher corrosion resistance. Hence, these coatings are mostly used in corrosive environments such as oil and gas industry, mining, chemical, and structural components, etc. Similarly, the corrosion resistance of the composite coatings is increased with increase in the content of composite particles [5]. In present days, electroless nickel coatings have gained wide popularity in automobile, mechanical, aerospace, chemical, electronic, printing, textile and in scientific domain, due to their excellent tribological properties. The EN composite coatings have better corrosion properties. The composite coatings in which second phase particles are uniformly distributed have excellent corrosion protection. Second phase particles reduce the metallic area of the coated surface and forms a physical barrier to resist the corrosion process [6-12]. On the other hand, composite coatings deposited with non-uniform distribution of second phase particles have lower corrosion resistance. Due to non-uniform distribution of particles, the coating structure becomes porous [13]. In case of soft composite coatings, the coating structure becomes dense and more homogeneous after heat treatment, which results in improvement in corrosion resistance compared to as-deposited soft coatings [14-16]. In most of the cases, heat treated composite coatings exhibited excellent corrosion resistance compared to as-deposited composite coatings. Heat treatment improves the density and structure of the coating, which results in decrease in porosity of the composite coating [17-19].

Generally, corrosion resistance of the Ni-P coatings depends on the rate of dissolution of the passive film apart from the amount of the phosphorus present in the coatings. In case of composite coatings it is observed that the formation of the passive layer is disturbed by the second phase particles which results into decrease in corrosion resistance of the composite coatings. Phosphorus present on the coated surface plays a vital role in corrosion resistance. An EN composite coating with higher phosphorus content shows excellent corrosion resistance, as the phosphide particles enables preferential hydrolysis of phosphorus over nickel [20]. The composite coating deposited using sol-gel technique has excellent corrosion resistance compared to conventional composite coatings and Ni-P coatings [21]. Surfactant present in the electroless bath reduces agglomeration of second phase particles, which results in uniform distribution of particles in the coated layer. Hence, surfactants improve the corrosion resistance of the composite coatings [22-23].

Corrosion behavior of electroless nickel coatings studies are achieved using electrochemical tests, namely, potentiodynamic polarization test and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy test. The resistance of the coatings towards corrosion is evaluated on the basis of the corrosion parameters obtained from corrosion potential (Ecorr), corrosion current density (Icorr), charge transfer resistance (Rct), double-layer capacitance (Cdl), and corrosion rate (Rc), etc. The present study deals with the evaluation of corrosion behavior of the Ni-P-TiO2 composite coating using potentiodynamic polarization tests. The Taguchi method with grey relational analysis has been employed to optimize the process parameters in order to find the optimum combination of coating parameters, which improve the electrochemical properties of the coatings. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is used to observe the level of significance of the factors and their interactions. In the last, confirmation test is conducted to validate the test results. The surface morphology and composition of Ni-P-TiO2 coatings have been studied with the help of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersed X-ray analysis (EDX) and X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD).

 

Materials and methods

Preparation of the substrate and electroless composite bath

In the present work AISI 1040 (mild steel) is used as substrate material with size 20 mm × 20 mm × 2 mm. Effective deposition of the coating on the substrate depends on the preparation of the substrate. Hence, it is essential to prepare the surface of the substrate carefully and properly. Different machining processes such as shaping, parting, milling and grinding have been used in the given sequence to prepare the square shape substrates. Initially, the substrate was cleaned with the help of de-ionized water to remove foreign particles. Before coating process, the substrate is subjected to pickling treatment to remove the layer formed due to rust and other oxides. After that the substrate is rinsed with de-ionized water and cleaned with methanol. In the initial stage of the coating deposition process, the substrate is activated in warm palladium chloride solution to increase the coating deposition rate. After that, the activated substrate is immediately dipped in the hot electroless bath, maintained at 85 °C. The coating deposition process is carried out for three hours. For each substrate the constant deposition time is maintained to obtain uniform thickness of the coating. The coating thickness has been found in the range of 25 to 29 microns.

Fig. 1 shows the experimental setup for electroless Ni-P-TiO2 composite coating.

 

 

The setup consists of heater cum magnetic stirrer (IKA®r; RCT basic) with temperature range from 0 to 310 °C and the stirrer speed range from 0 to 1500 rpm. A fixed rigid stand was provided to hold and support the substrate and the glass coated temperature sensor. A glass beaker (250 mL) containing the electroless bath (200 mL) was put on the heating plate for coating deposition. With the help of a temperature sensing knob, the temperature was set up to 85 °C and the stirrer speed set with the help of the speed setting knob at 300 rpm. The important function of PTFE coated magnetic stirrer is to maintain the TiO2 particles in suspension without agglomeration in the electroless bath. The stirrer speed is fixed after a large number of iterations to avoid the decomposition of the electroless bath due to the agglomeration of particles.

It is very important to select the appropriate process parameters (chemicals and other factors) along with their quantity. The bath composition and operating conditions for electroless TiO2 composite coatings are selected after various experiments, and the proper range of the parameters is chosen accordingly. The three most important parameters (nickel source, reducing agent, and concentration of TiO2 particles) are varied and the other parameters kept constant for the coating deposition. To understand the effect of heat treatment on corrosion resistance, the coated substrates are heat treated in a muffle furnace for one hour at different temperatures (300 °C, 400 °C, and 500 °C) according to the Orthogonal Array (OA). After heat treatment, the substrates are cooled down to room temperature in the furnace without application of any artificial cooling. The bath composition and operating conditions of the electroless Ni-P-TiO2 composite coatings are shown in Table 1.

 

 

Role of coating parameters and working conditions in the electroless bath

In the electroless bath, nickel sulphate is used as nickel source (it supplies nickel ions in the solution) and sodium hypophosphite is used as reducing agent which reduces the nickel ions from their positive valence state to zero valence state. At 85 °C bath temperature, the rapid and fast chemical reaction between the nickel source and the reducing agent results in immediate decomposition of the electroless bath. In such case, complexing agents are used to avoid decomposition of the bath. Sometime bath gets decomposed even though complexing agents are present in the electroless bath; in such situation, stabilizers play an important role to avoid the bath decomposition. Surfactants are used to increase the wettability and surface charge of the second phase particles [24]. Surfactant reduces the surface tension of the liquid and interfacial tension between solid and liquid particles. It also reduces the agglomeration of the second phase particles and adsorption of suspended particles on the specimen [25]. Approximately 50 mL of electroless bath solution containing specified amount of TiO2 particles and SDS are thoroughly mixed using a magnetic stirrer (Remi make 2 MLH) for better suspension of particles in the electroless bath. At first Ni-P coating is deposited for one hour to prevent the porosity of the coating, then the slurry of TiO2 particles, SDS and electroless bath (50 mL) are introduced into the same bath for the subsequent two hours to deposit the TiO2 composite coating.

Potentiodynamic polarization test

The potentiodynamic polarization tests of heat treated electroless Ni-P-TiO2 composite coated substrates are carried out using a potentiostat [(Gill AC) of ACM instrument, U. K.] with 3.5% NaCl solution at ambient temperature (33 °C). The electrochemical cell consists of three electrodes. A saturated calomel electrode (SCE) is used as reference electrode, which provides a stable 'reference' against which the applied potential is accurately measured. A platinum electrode is used as counter electrode or auxiliary electrode, which provides the path for the applied current into the electrolyte solution. The coated specimen is used as working electrode. The design of the cell is such that only an area of 1 cm2 of the coated surface is exposed to the electrolyte. The experimental setup of the potentiodynamic polarization test is shown in Fig. 2.

 

 

A settling time of 15 minutes is assigned before every test in order to stabilize the open circuit potential (OCP). The potentiostat is controlled with the help of a personnel computer, which also stores the polarization data. The polarization curve is obtained from dedicated software, which also possesses a special tool in order to extrapolate the values of corrosion potential and corrosion current density from the plot. A Tafel ruler is provided with associated software to measure the corrosion potential and corrosion current density. A horizontal ruler is matched at the junction of the cathodic and anodic branches. This point gives the value of the corrosion potential and the corrosion current density is obtained by extrapolating the fitting lines of the anodic and cathodic branches of the Tafel curve.

Microstructure study and characterization of Ni-P-TiO2 composite coating

Energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX Corporation) is used to verify and find out the presence of nickel, phosphorus, titanium, and oxygen in the composite coating in terms of weight percentage. Scanning electron microscopy (JEOL, JSM-6360) is used to observe the surface morphology of the composite coating before and after heat treatment (400 °C). This is done in order to analyze the effect of heat treatment on the surface structure of electroless Ni-P-TiO2 composite coatings. An X-ray diffraction analyzer (Rigaku, Ultima III) is used to find out the phase composition of as-deposited and heat treated composite coatings.

Coating process optimization and planning of experiment

The design factors or input parameters (experimental parameters) are varied within the specific range to obtain a desired result of the response variables (output parameters). The aim of the study is to obtain an optimum combination of the design factors for the best possible value of response variables. There are many factors which are considered to improve the corrosion behavior of Ni-PTiO2 composite coatings. On the basis of literature review [26-29] the most influential process parameters are selected to improve the electrochemical performance of the composite coating. In the present work, nickel sulphate (A), sodium hypophosphite (B), concentration of TiO2 particles (C) and annealing temperature (D) are considered as process parameters due to their effect on corrosion resistance. Table 2 shows the design factors along with their levels.

 

 

In the present experiment, four process parameters are used with three levels; therefore the total degrees of freedom (DOF) considering the individual factors and their interaction are 20. Hence the L27 orthogonal array (OA) is chosen which has 27 rows corresponding to the number of experiments and 26 DOF with 13 columns. The L27 OA is shown in Table 3.

 

 

Each row in the table represents the specific combination of experimental run and each column represents a specific factor or interactions. The cell value indicates the level of corresponding factor or interaction assigned to that column. The experimental run is controlled by the setting of the design factors and not by the interactions.

The aim of the present study is to improve corrosion potential and to reduce the corrosion current density of the TiO2 composite coating. Hence, it becomes a multiple response problem of optimization which cannot be solved only by Taguchi technique [30], because it may be possible that higher S/N ratio of one response corresponds to the lower S/N ratio of the other. Grey relational analysis [31] is used for overall evaluation of the S/N ratio to optimize the multiple response characteristics. The optimization process is performed in number of stages. In the first stage, the experimental results are normalized in the range of one and zero. Grey relational generation and grey relational coefficients are calculated using normalized data. The normalized data represent the correlation between actual experimental data and the desired experimental data. In the third stage grey relational grade is calculated by averaging the grey relational coefficients. The grey relational grade is treated as the overall response of the process instead of multiple responses of corrosion potential and corrosion current density.

 

Results and discussion

Surface morphology and characterization of Ni-P-TiO2 composite coating

The characterization of the coating is vital to check the content of elements in the composite coating. Energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) is used to find the existence of coating elements in terms of weight percentage. Table 4 shows the EDX result of Ni-P-TiO2 composite coatings at different concentration of TiO2 particles in the electroless bath.

 

 

Fig. 3 shows the EDX plots for TiO2 composite coatings, with different concentrations of TiO2 particles (5 g/L and 10 g/L) in the electroless bath.

 

 

From EDX plots and the tabulated results it is confirmed that the weight percentage of titanium particles in the coating is increased (from 6.41 wt.% to 9.97 wt.%) with increase in concentration of TiO2 particles in the electroless bath. At the same time, weight percentage of nickel (80.72 to 75.17%) and phosphorus (8.13 to 7.74%) decreased and oxygen increased from 4.74% to 7.12%.

The SEM images of as-deposited and heat-treated Ni-P-TiO2 composite coatings are shown in Fig. 4.

 

 

The surface of the as-deposited coated substrate (Fig. 4a) shows typical nodular structure with uniform distribution of titanium particles. Fig. 4b shows the SEM micrographs of heat treated Ni-P-TiO2 composite coatings at 400 °C. From this figure, it is confirmed that the grain structure of the heat-treated composite coatings is changed due to the heat treatment. Also by careful observation, it is noticed that the grains are coarsened due to heat treatment at 400 °C. At this temperature, crystallization of nickel and precipitation of phosphide (Ni3P) occur, which reduces the porosity of the coating, resulting in increase in corrosion resistance.

Fig. 5 shows the X-ray diffraction plots for Ni-P-TiO2 composite coatings in as- deposited and heat-treated condition (400 °C).

 

 

Fig. 5a shows XRD plot for as-deposited TiO2 composite coating. A single broad peak at 44.24 diffraction angle confirmed the amorphous structure of as-deposited composite coating. Fig. 5b shows the XRD plot for heat treated (at 400 °C) TiO2 composite coating. From the plot it is confirmed that the amorphous structure of the composite coating converted in the crystalline structure. Due to heat treatment, peaks of Ni3P (hard particles) are seen at various diffraction angles. These particles are responsible for increase in hardness and wear resistance of TiO2 composite coatings.

Optimization of corrosion parameters and confirmation test

The experimental values of Ecorr and Icorr are shown in Table 5.

 

 

The present work deals with two responses, corrosion potential and corrosion current density, for optimization of corrosion behavior of Ni-P-TiO2 composite coatings. Grey analysis technique converts a multi response (variable) problem in a single response problem. The particular sets of analysis performed to convert the given multiple responses in single performance index, is called as grey relational grade. For excellent electrochemical performance, higher value of corrosion potential and lower value of corrosion current density are preferred. Hence, higher-thebetter criterion used for corrosion potential and lower-the-better criterion is used for corrosion current density. The equations for the higher-the-better and lowerthe- better criteria are given below,

Equation for higher-the-better

 

 

Equation for lower-the-better

 

 

where xi(k) is the normalized value after grey relational generation, while min yi(k) and max yi(k) are, respectively, the smallest and largest values of yi(k) for the kth response, with k =1 for corrosion potential and k = 2 for corrosion current density. Larger normalized results correspond to excellent performance and the best normalized result should equal to one. All the normalized values and grey relational coefficients are shown in Table 6.

 

 

The grey relational coefficient is calculated from the normalized value and the equation for the grey relational coefficient is given as below,

 

 

where Δoi = ∣∣ x0(k) - xi(k) ∣∣ is the difference of the absolute value between x0(k) and xi(k). Δmin and Δmax are the minimum and maximum values of the absolute differences (Δoi) of all comparing sequences. 'r' is the distinguishing coefficient which is used to adjust the difference of the relational coefficient in the range of 0 to 1. The suggested value of the distinguishing coefficient is 0.5. The overall multiple response characteristics evaluation is based on grey relational grade and it is calculated as follows:

 

 

where n is the number of process responses. The grey relational grades are considered in the optimization of multi-response parameter design problem. The values of grey relational grade are shown in Table 7.

 

 

Taguchi method is used to optimize the process parameters for high quality with low cost. In this technique, S/N ratio is used to convert the experimental results in value for the evaluation characteristics to optimum parameter analysis. Larger S/N ratio represents a better quality characteristic. The S/N ratio is maximized to reduce the effect of random noise factors and to find the effect of significant process parameters.

The S/N ratio for grey relational grade is calculated using higher-the-better criteria and the equation for higher-the-better is given below,

 

 

where 'y' is the observed data and 'n' is the number of observations. As the experimental design is orthogonal, it is possible to separate out the effect of each coating parameter at different levels. The mean grey relational grade for three levels of the three factors is summarized in Table 8.

 

 

All the calculations are performed with the help of Minitab software [32]. The response table shows the average of the selected characteristic for each level of the factors. The ranks shown in the table are based on Delta statistics and it compares the relative magnitude of effects. The Delta statistics is the difference of highest average and lowest average of each factor. Ranks are assigned on the basis of Delta values for, e. g., rank 1 is assigned to the highest Delta value, rank 2 is assigned to next highest value, and so on. The parameter which possesses higher delta value has greater influence over the response. From Table 8, it is confirmed that parameter D (annealing temperature) possesses the highest delta value; this means that it has the greatest influence on the electrochemical performance of electroless NiP- TiO2 composite coatings. Fig. 6 shows the main effects plot for mean S/N ratio and Fig. 7 shows the interaction plots between the process parameters.

 

 

 

The main effects plot gives the optimal combination of the coating process parameters for the desired electrochemical performance. If the line for a particular parameter in the main effect plot is horizontal, it means that the parameter has no significant effect. On the other hand, if the line has maximum inclination to horizontal line, it means that the parameter has the most significant effect. From Fig. 6, it is confirmed that concentration of TiO2 particles (parameter C) has the significant effect, annealing temperature (parameter D) has the most significant effect and nickel source (parameter A) has the moderate effect. Larger Grey relational grade has better multiresponse characteristics. The optimal combination of parameters was found as A3B2C3D3. Interactions between parameters A, B and C are shown in Fig. 7. From the plots it is confirmed that almost all lines are intersecting to each other, i.e., all factors have some amount of interaction between each other. Parameters A and C have the strong interaction and parameters A and B have moderate interaction. ANOVA is used to find the effect of the process parameters and their significance level. ANOVA gives the total variability of the response into contribution of each of the factors and the error. A sophisticated software, Minitab, is used to obtain the results through ANOVA using grey relational grade. ANOVA results for electrochemical behavior of the TiO2 composite coatings are shown in Table 9.

 

 

These calculations are based on the F-ratio (variance ratio). It is used to measure the significance of the parameters under investigation with respect to variations of all the terms included in the error term at the desired significance level. If the calculated value is higher than the tabulated value it means that the factor is significant at the desired level. From the table it is confirmed that parameter D (annealing temperature) has the most significant effect on the corrosion behaviour at the confidence level of 99% within the specific test range. The concentartion of TiO2 particels (C) has significant effect at 97.5% confidence level. Among the interactions, the interaction between parameters A and C has the most significant contribution at confidence level of 90%. From ANOVA table it is confirmed that parameter D has the largest contribution (26.35%) followed by parameter C (21.48%). Among the interactions, interaction A×C has the highest contribution (20.83%).

In the last, confirmation test is conducted on the basis of optimum combination of parameters with their respective levels. The predicted values of the grey relational grade at the optimum level hare calculated as

 

 

where ηm is the total mean grey relational grade, hiis the mean grey relational grade at optimal level, and 'o' is the number of main design parameters that significantly affect the electrochemical performance of Ni-P-TiO2 composite coating. Table 10 shows results of the confirmation test.

 

 

The increase of the grey relational grade from the initial condition (A2B2C2D2) to the optimal condition (A3B2C3D3) was found as 0.17576, which is more than 29.356% of the mean grey relational grade. It means that the corrosion resistance improved significantly.

The polarization curves for the Ni-P-TiO2 composite coatings at initial and optimal condition are shown in Fig. 8.

 

 

The polarization curves do not exhibit any passive behaviour. The corrosion potential and corrosion current density of the TiO2 composite coatings improved from initial condition (-394.38 mV) to optimum condition (-336.41 mV).

 

Conclusions

In the present study Taguchi method combined with grey relational analysis has been used to optimize the coating process parameters in order to improve the chemical behavior of Ni-P-TiO2 composite coating. The electrochemical tests were conducted using potentiodynamic polarization in 3.5% NaCl solution. The optimum parameters combination was found as, higher level of nickel sulphate (45 g/L), middle level of sodium hypophosphite (20 g/L), higher level of TiO2 particles (15 g/L), and higher level of annealing temperature (500 °C) (A3B2C3D3). From ANOVA results it is confirmed that annealing temperature and concentration of TiO2 particles have significant influence on the electrochemical behavior of the composite coating. The interaction between nickel source and concentration of TiO2 particles has the most significant influence among the interactions. The improvement in grey relational grade from the initial condition to the optimal condition has been found as 29.356%. From the EDX analysis it is confirmed that the coated layer embedded with titanium particles and consists of nickel, phosphorous, and oxygen. The SEM micrographs revealed that the coating has cauliflower like structure with uniform distribution of titanium particles. From XRD plots it is confirmed that the as-deposited coating has amorphous structure and the heat treated composite coating has crystalline structure. The coating deposited using the optimum combination has excellent corrosion resistance compared to the coating deposited using initial condition.

 

References

1. Riedel W. Electroless Nickel Plating. Ohio, USA. ASM International, Metal Park; 1991.         [ Links ]

2. Sahoo P, Das SK. Mater Design. 2011;32:1760.         [ Links ]

3. Sudagar J, Lian J, Sha W. J Alloys Compounds. 2013;571:183.         [ Links ]

4. Agarwala R C, Agarwala V. Sadhana. 2003;28:475.         [ Links ]

5. Sharma A, Singh A K. J Mater Eng Performance. 2013; 22: 176.         [ Links ]

6. Praveen B M, Venkatesha T V, Naik Y A, et al. Surf Coat Technol. 2007;201:5836.         [ Links ]

7. Lee C K. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2012;7:8487.         [ Links ]

8. Hosseini J, Bodaghi A, Port Electrichim Acta. 2013;31:1.         [ Links ]

9. Novakovic J, Vassiliou P, Samara K L, et al. Surf Coat Technol. 2006;201:895.         [ Links ]

10. Momenzadeh M, Sanjabi S, Mater Corrosion. 2012;63:614.         [ Links ]

11. Malfatti C F, Ferreira J Z, Santos C B, et al. Corrosion Sci. 2005;47:567.         [ Links ]

12. Rabizadeh T, Allahkaram S R. Mater Design. 2011;32:133.         [ Links ]

13. Zarebidaki A, Allahkaram S R. Micro Nano Letters. 2011;6:937.         [ Links ]

14. Zarebidaki A, Allahkaram S R. Micro Nano Letters. 2012;7:907.         [ Links ]

15. Lee C K. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2012;7:12941.         [ Links ]

16. Liu Y. Corrosion Sci. 2005;47:2807.         [ Links ]

17. Ranganatha S, Venkatesha T V, Vathsala K. Appl Surf Sci. 2010;256:7377.         [ Links ]

18. Bigdeli F, Allahkaram S R. Mater Design. 2009;30:4450.         [ Links ]

19. Leon C, Gracia-Ochoa E, Gracia-Guerra J, et al. Surf Coat Technol. 2010;205:2425.         [ Links ]

20. Balaraju J N, Sankara N T S N, Seshadri S K. J Solid State Electrochem. 2001;5:334.         [ Links ]

21. Song L, Wang Y, Lin W, et al. Surf Coat Technol. 2008;202:5146.         [ Links ]

22. Mafi I R, Dehghanian C. Appl Surf Sci. 2011;257:8653.         [ Links ]

23. Liu D, Yan Y, Lee K, et al. Mater Corrosion. 2009;60:690.         [ Links ]

24. Xu H, Yang Z, Li MK, et al. Surf Coat Technol. 2005;191:161.         [ Links ]

25. Liu D, Yan Y, Lee K, et al. Mater Corrosion. 2009;60:690.         [ Links ]

26. Das S K, Sahoo P. Tribology. 2011;5:16.         [ Links ]

27. Roy S, Sahoo P. J Coatings. 2013. In press. DOI: 10.1155/2013/6081140.         [ Links ]

28. Gadhari P, Sahoo P. Appl Mechanics Mater. 2014;592-594:1300.         [ Links ]

29. Gadhari P, Sahoo P. Port Electrochim Acta. 2014;32:137.         [ Links ]

30. Roy R K. A primer on the Taguchi method, Society of Manufacturing Engineers. Mich, USA. Dearborn; 1990.         [ Links ]

31. Deng J. J Grey System. 1989;1:1.         [ Links ]

32. Minitab user manual (release 13.2), Making data analysis easier, MINITAB Incorporation, State College, PA, USA. 2001.         [ Links ]

 

*Corresponding author. E-mail address: psjume@gmail.com

Received 10 June 2015; accepted 20 June 2015

www.peacta.org

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License