SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.42 número2Efeito de preparados homeopáticos no vigor de sementes e desenvolvimento de plântulas de feijãoLongevidade de sementes de Colubrina glandulosa Perkins armazenadas índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista de Ciências Agrárias

versão impressa ISSN 0871-018X

Rev. de Ciências Agrárias vol.42 no.2 Lisboa jun. 2019

https://doi.org/10.19084/rca.15833 

ARTIGO

Electrical conductivity test in soybean seeds with reduced imbibition period

Teste de condutividade elétrica em sementes de soja com período de embebição reduzido

Hugo César Rodrigues Moreira Catão1,* and Franciele Caixeta2

1 Faculdades Integradas de Ourinhos, Department of Plant Sciences, Rodovia BR 153, Km 338, CEP 19909-100, Ourinhos, SP, Brasil

2 General Mills Brasil Alimentos Ltda., R. Benjamin Constant, 17, CEP 86390-000, Cambará - PR, Brasil

(*E-mail: hugocatao@yahoo.com.br)


ABSTRACT

The search for vigor tests that offer fast and reliable information about the physiological potential of seeds is fundamental in quality control. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of different temperatures associated with the reduction of soybean imbibition period in the electrical conductivity test. Seven seed lots of the cultivar TMG 7062 IPRO were used in this assessment. For the initial characterization of the lots, we determined the water content, the first and the final count of the germination test, the emergence, the accelerated aging, and the traditional electrical conductivity. The other method used for the electrical conductivity test consisted of 20 replicates of 10 seeds which were placed in plastic cups with 25ml of deionized water, and soaked in 10 min, 30 min, 60 min, and 120 min at temperatures of 30oC, 35oC, 40oC, and 45oC. The experimental design was completely randomized. We were able to reduce the imbibition period since its results were similar to those of the traditional methodology. The electrical conductivity test performed using the 30 minutes imbibition period at temperatures of 30oC or 35oC provides consistent information that allows the identification of lots of soybean seeds with different levels of vigor.

Keywords: Glycine max (L.) Merrill, vigor, imbibition period, temperature.


RESUMO

Testes de vigor que ofereçam rapidez e informações seguras sobre o potencial fisiológico das sementes é de fundamental importância no controle de qualidade. Objetivou-se por isso avaliar o efeito de diferentes temperaturas associados à redução do período de embebição das sementes de soja no teste de condutividade elétrica. Foram utilizados sete lotes de sementes da cultivar TMG 7062 IPRO. Para a caracterização inicial dos lotes determinou-se o teor de água, a primeira e a contagem final do teste de germinação, a emergência, o envelhecimento acelerado e a condutividade elétrica tradicional. A outra metodologia para o teste de condutividade elétrica proposta consistiu em usar 20 repetições de 10 sementes, colocadas em copos plásticos com 25mL de água deionizada, embebidas durante 10, 30, 60 e 120 minutos nas temperaturas de 30oC, 35oC, 40oC e 45oC. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi o inteiramente casualizado. Os resultados obtidos evidenciaram a possibilidade de reduzir o período de embebição dado terem sido semelhantes aos da metodologia tradicional. O teste de condutividade elétrica realizado com o período de embebição de 30 minutos nas temperaturas de 30 ou 35oC forneceu informações consistentes que permitiram a identificação de lotes de sementes de soja com diferentes níveis de vigor.

Palavras-chave: Glycine max (L.) Merrill, vigor, período de embebição, temperatura.


INTRODUCTION

The use of high quality seeds is an important factor in increasing crop yield. The quality of soybean seeds can be affected by a number of factors which may occur at any stage of production. Fast and efficient tests should be used in order to estimate seed viability and therefore guarantee the quality of these seeds (Mattioni et al., 2015).

The germination test is the official and standardized procedure to evaluate the ability of the seeds to produce normal seedlings under ideal conditions. However, this test has some disadvantages including a delay in the release of the results and the fact that it not always show differences in performance between seed lots (Milani et al., 2012). Quality control should be increasingly efficient due to the competitiveness and market demand (Fessel et al., 2010). Thus, one of the main requirements for assessing seed vigor is to obtain reliable results in a relatively short period of time. This short and fast turnaround time would speed up decision making.

Electrical conductivity is one of the most studied rapid tests and is related to initial, early stages in the sequence of events in seed deterioration (Delouche & Baskin, 1973). This is a simple, low cost, objective, fast test in which results are released within 24 hours (Vieira & Krzyzanowski, 1999). The results are obtained by the indirect evaluation of the degree of structure of the cell membranes by determining the amount of leached ions in the imbibition solution such as sugars, amino acids, organic acids, proteins and phenolic substances, and inorganic ions including K+, Ca++, Mg++, and Na++ (Vieira & Krzyzanowski, 1999; Marcos Filho, 2015).

Many factors may influence the results of the electrical conductivity test such as the genotype, the decontamination of the membranes, the size = and number of the seeds of the sample, the temperature, and the imbibition period. These factors are the targets of research in the search for more consistent results especially the temperature and the imbibition period which are considered to be extremely important factors (Carvalho et al., 2009).

The majority of the studies about soybean seeds traditionally recommend the temperature of 25oC with a period of 24-h of imbibition for the electrical conductivity reading (AOSA, 1983; Krzyzanowski et al., 1991; Vieira, 1994). Research studies have shown that it is possible to reduce the period of imbibition since the shortest time used to discriminate seed lots was 4 h (Loeffler et al., 1988; Marcos Filho et al., 1990; Dias & Marcos Filho, 1996). However, with the large number of samples to be analyzed in laboratories, it is necessary to obtain faster results in short turnaround times without affecting consistency and reliability.

According to Murphy & Noland (1982), the temperature during imbibition directly influences the rate of imbibition and the leaching of electrolytes from inside the cells to the external environment. The values of the electrical conductivity increased with the elevation of the soaking temperature for soybean seeds (Carvalho et al., 2009), corn popcorn (Ribeiro et al., 2009), and sunflower (Oliveira et al., 2012). However, Gaspar & Nakagawa (2002) observed that there was no difference between the temperatures studied (20oC, 25oC, 30oC, 35oC, and 40oC) in the assessment of electric conductivity of millet seeds. This finding was previously reported by Hampton & Tekrony (1995). These researchers pointed out that the temperature has an effect on the amount and rate of release of exudates during imbibition. However, it does not necessarily classify batches for vigor.

Few publications associate temperature elevation with a possible reduction of the imbibition period in crops of high economic value such as soybean crops. Thus, this explains the fact that the temperature of 25oC is virtually standardized and therefore concentrates the research on the variation of seed imbibition period. In view of the above, the present study aimed to examine the effect of different temperatures associated with the reduction of the imbibition period of soybean seeds in the electrical conductivity test.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This research study was conducted at the Laboratory of Seed Analysis of the Faculdades Integradas de Ourinhos (FIO) located in the city of Ourinhos, State of São Paulo (SP), southeast Brazil. Soybean seeds from 7 lots of the cultivar TMG 7062 IPRO produced in the 2017 crop were used in the experiments.

The initial characterization of the batches was performed using the following tests:

Water content: The greenhouse method at 105 ± 3 ° C was used; 2 sub samples with 25 g of seeds each were used according to the protocol published by Brasil (2009).

Germination test: This test was performed with 4 replicates of 50 seeds. These samples were seeded in germitest paper substrate which was previously moistened with distilled water in the proportion of 2.5 ml g-1 of paper. The seeds were kept in germinators at a constant temperature of 25 °C. The evaluation consisted of 2 normal seedling counts at 5 days (first count) and 8 days after the test installation (Brasil, 2009). The results were expressed as percentage of germination at the first count and at the final count.

Emergence test: Sowing was carried out in the field with 4 sub samples of 50 seeds of each lot distributed in depth of 3.0 cm, spacing of 0.5 cm, and in grooves with 1.0 meter in length. The soil was moistened until approximately 60% of the water retention capacity. On the 13th day after the stabilization of the stand, the number of emerged seedlings was counted and the results were expressed as a percentage.

Accelerated aging test: Plastic boxes (gearbox) containing 40ml of distilled water were used. These boxes had 40ml of distilled water at the bottom in which 4 replicates of 50 seeds were placed on a steel screen which isolated the seeds from the water. These boxes were kept in an incubator type BOD at 42oC for 48h (AOSA, 1983). After that, the germination test was set up. The number of normal seedlings was evaluated 5 days after this test was set up. The results were expressed the in percentage (%).

Electrical conductivity test: The electrical conductivity test was conducted in two manners. The first one was carried out with the purpose of initial characterization of seed lots. For such purpose, we used the traditional method which consisted of 4 replicates of 50 seeds. These samples were weighed with a precision of 2 decimal places and then placed in 200ml plastic cups containing 75 ml of deionized water. Subsequently, these specimens were kept in a germinator at 25 °C for 24-h. After this step, containers were removed and solutions containing the seeds were slightly stirred with a stick in order to standardize the leachates and were immediately read in a conductivity meter (Tecnal Tec-4MP) with constant electrode 1 (Vieira, 1994).

In the second mode of conduction, the electric conductivity test was run in order to determine the vigor of the seed lots at elevated temperatures. Each replicate consisted of 20 replicates of 10 seeds. These samples were placed in plastic cups with 25 mL of deionized water and kept for 10 min, 30 min, 60 min, and 120 min in a BOD type incubator at temperatures of 30oC, 35oC, 40oC, and 45oC.

The temperatures were separated for the evaluation and therefore were not included as a variable in the assay. After each imbibition period, seeds were gently stirred in order to standardize the leachate, and the electrical conductivity of the solution was measured. In both cases the mass method was used to measure the conductivity with non-selected seeds, as proposed by Loeffler et al. (1988). The results were expressed as μS cm-1 g-1 of seeds.

A completely randomized design was used for the tests described. In the electrical conductivity test with 20 sub samples, the analysis of variance was performed separately for each temperature and for each imbibition period. For the statistical analysis of the data, we used the F test and the analysis of variance at 5% of the probability. The means were compared by the Scott-Knott test at 5% probability using the software SISVAR 5.0 (Ferreira, 2011). Pearson‘s linear correlation analysis was also performed between the electrical conductivity test and the emergency test.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

According to the results presented in Table 1, we noticed significant differences between the lots of soybean seeds. But data on water content of the seeds were similar between the lots studied, this is a significant finding for the execution of the tests as the uniformity of the initial water content of the seeds contributes to obtaining consistent results (Loeffler et al., 1988). Guedes et al. (2011) also pointed out that differences from 1% to 2% in the water content between samples are not a cause for concern and do not compromise test results. Therefore, these tests can still be performed. We found that the water content of the batches varied between 11 and 12%, i.e. within the range that does not influence the results of the electrical conductivity test (Hampton et al., 1992; Hampton, 1995). Marcos Filho (1999) also reported that variations from 4% to 5% between the samples are considered tolerable and acceptable.

 

 

The analysis of the results of the germination tests, first germination count, field emergence, accelerated aging, and electrical conductivity (25oC/24-h) indicates that the soybean seed lots differed from each other in their physiological quality (Table 1). In the germination test, it was noticed that lots 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 have similar germination which values were above 90%. The germination of lot 1 was 70% which performance was inferior in comparison with the other lots. In the evaluation of vigor by the first germination count, no differences were observed between the same lots (2, 3, 4, 5, and 6).

According to Araujo et al. (2011) lots with similar germination are fundamental in studies that aim to determine methods to evaluate seed vigor since the objective is to identify lots of seeds with similar germination. If the germination potential of the seeds presents significant differences, the germination test itself can detect differences in the physiological potential of the seeds (Marcos Filho & Novembre, 2009).

In the field emergence test that simulates the actual sowing conditions, we noted that lots 5 and 6 had a superior emergence in comparison with lots 2, 3, and 4. Lots 5 and 6 are classified as high vigor lots, lots 2, 3, 4 and 7 as moderate (intermediate) vigor lots, and lot 1 as a low vigor lot. The seedling emergence test is considered as the best indicator of seed vigor. To carry out this test, it is necessary to apply conditions that simulate those that seeds are subjected to in the field during sowing (Guedes et al., 2011).

The tests of accelerated aging and electric conductivity stratified the seed lots even further for vigor and were therefore more sensitive to separate the lots (Table 1). Thus, lots 5 and 6 have high vigor, lots 2 and 3 have intermediate vigor, lots 4 and 7 are of low vigor, and lot 1 was the lot with the lowest vigor. The tests used to evaluate the physiological quality should be able to follow the process and changes during seed deterioration especially when these seeds are subjected to adverse conditions (Carvalho et al., 2009).

The deterioration process of seeds causes degenerative changes in its membrane system which decreases its integrity and/or reducing its selectivity. Control in water and solute exchanges between cells and the external environment is lost which results in a decrease in seed viability (Vieira, 1994; Binotti et al., 2008). Thus, the electrical conductivity test that was carried out to assess seed vigor related to the amount of leachate varied according to the methods used in this study (Table 2).

 

 

At 30 °C in the periods of 30 min, 60 min, and 150 min there was increased separation of seed lots. It should be emphasize =d that a vigor test has to be conducted quickly. Therefore, the 30 min long test would be the ideal test to evaluate seed lots. At the temperature of 35oC with the exception of the imbibition period of 120 min, it was verified that the other periods stratified the lots of soybean seeds, separating the lots in four levels of vigor. We also noticed that the periods of 30 min and 60 min at 30oC and 30 min at 35oC had similar classification in terms of strength in those cases in which the electrical conductivity test was performed for 24 h at 25o C (traditional test).

In those cases in which the test was conducted at 40oC and 10 min of imbibition period, we noticed that the seed lots were separated into only three vigor levels. In the other imbibition periods, seed lots were separated into two levels of vigor at the most despite the increase of leachates. A similar performance was observed when this test was carried out at 45oC. Despite the high leaching, it was not possible to stratify seed lots in more than two levels of vigor.

Based on the results of the electrical conductivity test, we may infer that, in general, in the methods studied there was an increase of leachates in the water during seed conditioning. However, this leaching is more intense at 40 °C and 45 °C. Our findings corroborate with those of Dias & Marcos Filho (1996) and Gaspar & Nakagawa (2002) who evaluated the electrical conductivity in soybean and millet seeds, respectively.

According to Bewley & Black (1994), high temperatures increase the amount of leachates. This is due to the destruction of the cell membrane system and is related to its integrity. A process of reorganization of these membranes would not occur if there was an increase in leaching in the seed soaking solution.

Despite the statistical differences between the seed lots, higher imbibition times indicate that high temperatures (40oC and 45oC) provide mean equity and reduce the difference between seed vigor levels. Carvalho et al. (2009) pointed out that high temperatures with prolonged exposure periods promote the concentration and stabilization of leachate means in the electrical conductivity test.

With regard to the possibility of reducing the period of seed imbibition, it was observed that the results obtained in the methods of electrical conductivity conducted for 30 min at 30oC and at 35oC were similar. The traditional method was conducted at 25oC for 24‑h. This becomes even more evident when we observe the correlation between the electrical conductivity methods and the seedling emergence test (Table 3).

 

 

The correlation data were negative with a significance of 5%, according to the T-test. Thus, the results are inversely proportional. As the electrical conductivity is increased (μS cm-1 g-1), there is a decrease in the percentage of seedling emergence (Table 1).

It can be noted that, considering the imbibition period at the temperatures tested, the strongest correlations were observed in 30 minutes at 30oC and 35oC. However, there was also a high correlation of the data in 60 minutes at 30oC. Nevertheless, it is recommended that a shorter imbibition period is used since a vigor test should be fast and consistent in results. This reinforces the finding that the methods used in the imbibition periods were coherent to evaluate seed vigor.

According to the results obtained in this study, we suggest a reduction of the imbibition period of soybean seeds in the periods used and therefore allow the disposal of lots of inferior vigor. The possibility of reducing the conduction time of the electrical conductivity test is necessary in view of the demand of the analysis to be performed. As a large number of samples are submitted to the laboratories, this will be an additional tool available for the assessment of seed lots in a shorter period of time and fast turnaround time. The reduction of the imbibition period of the electrical conductivity test was previously reported by other authors in the evaluation of the vigor of popcorn seeds (Ribeiro et al., 2009), mung green beans (Araujo et al., 2011) and beans (Silva et al., 2014).

CONCLUSION

The electrical conductivity test performed with a 30 min imbibition period at temperatures of 30oC or 35oC provides consistent, reliable information that allows the identification of lots of soybean seeds with different vigor levels.

 

References

AOSA (1983) - Seed vigor testing handbook. [S.l.]: Association of Official Seed Analysts. 93 p. (Contribution, 32).         [ Links ]

Araujo, R.F.; Zonta, J.B.; Araujo, E.F.; Heberle, E. & Zonta, F.M.G. (2011) - Teste de condutividade elétrica para sementes de feijão-mungo-verde. Revista Brasileira de Sementes, vol. 33, n. 1, p.123-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31222011000100014        [ Links ]

Bewley, J.D. & Black, M. (1994) - Seeds: physiology of development and germination. 2a ed. New York: Plenum Press. 445p.         [ Links ]

Binotti, F.F.S.; Haga, K.I.; Cardoso, E.D.; Alves, C.Z.; Sá, M.E. & Arf, O. (2008) - Efeito do período de envelhecimento acelerado no teste de condutividade elétrica e na qualidade fisiológica de sementes de feijão. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy, vol. 30, n. 2, p. 247-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-86212008000200014        [ Links ]

Brasil (2009) - Regras para análise de sementes. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Secretaria de Defesa Agropecuária. Brasília, 399 p.

Carvalho, L.F.; Sediyama, C.S.; Reis, M.S.; Dias, D.C.F.S. & Moreira, M.A. (2009) - Influência da temperatura de embebição da semente de soja no teste de condutividade elétrica para avaliação da qualidade fisiológica. Revista Brasileira de Sementes, vol. 31, n. 1, p. 9-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31222009000100001        [ Links ]

Delouche, J.E. & Baskin, E.E. (1973) - Accelerated aging techniques for predicting the relative storability of seed lots. Seed Science & Technology, vol. 1, n. 2, p. 427-452.         [ Links ]

Dias, D.C.F.S. & Marcos Filho, J. (1996) - Testes de condutividade elétrica para avaliação do vigor de sementes de soja (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Scientia Agricola, vol. 53, n. 1, p. 31-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90161996000100005        [ Links ]

Ferreira, D.F. (2011) - Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, vol. 35, n. 6, p. 1039-1042. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542011000600001        [ Links ]

Fessel, S.A.; Panobianco, M.; Souza, C.R. & Vieira, R.D. (2010) - Teste de condutividade elétrica em sementes de soja armazenadas sob diferentes temperaturas. Bragantia, vol. 69, n. 1, p. 207-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052010000100026        [ Links ]

Gaspar, C.M. & Nakagawa, J. (2002) - Teste de condutividade elétrica em função do número de sementes e da quantidade de água para sementes de milheto. Revista Brasileira de Sementes, vol. 24, n. 2, p. 82-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31222002000100012        [ Links ]

Guedes, R.S.; Alves, E.U.; Oliveira, L.S.B.; Andrade, L.A.; Gonçalves, E.P. & Melo, P.A.R.F. (2011) - Envelhecimento acelerado na avaliação da qualidade fisiológica de sementes de Dalbergia nigra (Vell.) Fr. All. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, vol. 32, n. 2, p. 443-450. http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n2p443        [ Links ]

Hampton, J.G. (1995) - Conductivity test. In: Venter, H.A. van de (Ed.) - Seed vigour testing seminar. Copenhagen: ISTA. p.10-28.         [ Links ]

Hampton, J.G.; Johnstone, K.A. & Eua-Umpon, V. (1992) - Bulk conductivity test variables for mungbean, soybean and French bean seed lots. Seed Science and Technology, vol. 20, n. 3, p. 677-686.         [ Links ]

Hampton, J.G. & Tekrony, D.M. (1995) - Handbook of vigour test methods. 3.ed. Zurich: ISTA. 117p.         [ Links ]

Krzyzanowski, F.C.; França Neto, J.B. & Henning, A.A. (1991) - Relato dos testes de vigor disponíveis para as grandes culturas. Informativo Abrates, vol. 1, n. 2, p. 15-53.         [ Links ]

Loeffler, T.M.; Tekrony, D.M. & Egli, D.B. (1988) - The bulk conductivity test as an indicator of soybean seed quality. Journal Seed Technology, vol. 12, n. 1, p. 37-53.         [ Links ]

Marcos Filho, J. (2015) - Fisiologia de sementes de plantas cultivadas. Piracicaba: FEALQ, 495p.         [ Links ]

Marcos Filho, J. & Novembre, A.D.L.C. (2009) - Avaliação do potencial fisiológico de sementes de hortaliças. In: Nascimento, W.M. (Ed.) - Tecnologia de sementes de hortaliças. Brasília, DF: Embrapa Hortaliças, p.185-246.         [ Links ]

Marcos Filho, J.; Silva, W.R.; Novembre, A.C. & Chama, H.C.P.C. (1990) - Estudo comparativo de métodos para avaliação da qualidade fisiológica de sementes de soja, com ênfase ao teste de condutividade elétrica. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, vol. 25, n. 12, p. 1805-1815.         [ Links ]

Marcos Filho, J. (1999) - Teste de envelhecimento acelerado. In: Krzyzanowski, F.C.; Vieira, R.D. & França Neto, J.B. (Eds.) - Vigor de sementes: conceitos e testes. Londrina: ABRATES. cap.3, p.1-24.         [ Links ]

Mattioni, N.M.; Mertz, L.M.; Barbieri, A.P.P.; Haesbaert, F.M.; Giordani, W. & Lopes, S.J. (2015) - Individual electrical conductivity test for the assessment of soybean seed germination. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, vol. 36, n. 1, p. 31-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n1p31        [ Links ]

Milani, M.; Menezes, N.L. & Lopes, S.J. (2012) - Teste de condutividade elétrica para avaliação do potencial fisiológico de sementes de canola. Revista Ceres, vol. 59, n. 3, p. 374-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-737X2012000300012        [ Links ]

Murphy, J.B. & Noland, T.L. (1982) - Temperature effects on seed imbibition and leakage mediated by viscosity and membranes. Plant Physiology, vol. 69, n. 2, p. 428-431.         [ Links ]

Oliveira, F.N.; Torres, S.B.; Vieira, F.E.R.; Paiva, E.P. & Dutra, A.S. (2012) - Qualidade fisiológica de sementes de girassol avaliadas por condutividade elétrica. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, vol. 42, n. 3, p. 279-287.         [ Links ]

Ribeiro, D.M.; Bragança, S.M.; Goneli, A.L.D.; Dias, D.C.F.S. & Alvarenga, E.M. (2009) - Teste de condutividade elétrica para avaliar o vigor de sementes em milho-pipoca (Zea mays L.). Revista Ceres, vol. 56, n. 6, p. 772-776.         [ Links ]

Silva, V.N.; Zambiasi, C.A.; Tillmann, M.A.A.; Menezes, N.L. & Villela, F.A. (2014) - Condução do teste de condutividade elétrica utilizando partes de sementes de feijão. Revista de Ciências Agrárias, vol. 37, n. 2, p. 206-213.         [ Links ]

Vieira, R.D. (1994) - Teste de condutividade elétrica. In: Vieira, R.D. & Carvalho, N.M. (Eds.) - Testes de vigor em sementes. Jaboticabal: FUNEP. p. 103-132.         [ Links ]

Vieira, R.D. & Krzyzanowski, F.C. (1999) - Teste de condutividade elétrica. In: Krzyzanowski, F.C.; Vieira, R.D. & França Neto, J.B. (Eds.) - Vigor de sementes: conceitos e testes. Londrina: ABRATES. cap.3, p.1-24.         [ Links ]

 

Received/recebido: 2018.12.03

Accepted/aceite: 2019.01.16

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons