SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 número3Dizer «não» aos estereótipos sociais: as ironias do controlo mentalCrença no mundo justo e vitimização secundária: o papel moderador da inocência da vítima e da persistência do sofrimento índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Análise Psicológica

versão impressa ISSN 0870-8231

Aná. Psicológica v.21 n.3 Lisboa jul. 2003

 

Em busca da distinção perdida: Acessibilidade versus disponibilidade mnésicas em cognição social

 

MARGARIDA GARRIDO (*)

LEONEL GARCIA-MARQUES (**)

 

RESUMO

A compreensão da forma como se representa, organiza e recupera informação de memória acerca de pessoas e acontecimentos sociais constitui actualmente uma das áreas fundamentais de desenvolvimento teórico e metodológico da Cognição Social.

A literatura produzida neste âmbito permite distinguir quatro grandes abordagens, duas delas subjacentes à maior parte da investigação: as redes associativas e as representações esquemáticas; e duas mais recentes: os exemplares e as representações distribuídas. As duas primeiras abordagens, que têm prevalecido em Cognição Social, privilegiam os processos de codificação em detrimento dos processos de recuperação mnésica, levando a que a investigação nesta área continue a concentrar-se nos processos de codificação e organização de informação social em memória e a negligenciar os processos de recuperação que geralmente se assumem como invariantes. Procuraremos no presente artigo descrever e contrastar estas propostas, apresentando alguns argumentos teóricos e empíricos que reforçam a importância dos processos de recuperação, questionando ainda o pressuposto de invariância destes processos, explicita ou implicitamente presente na literatura.

Palavras-chave: Cognição Social, modelos de memória, recuperação mnésica.

 

ABSTRACT

Understanding the way we encode, organize and retrieve information from memory about people and social episodes is nowadays one of the most prominent fields of theoretical and methodological research in Social Cognition.

From the literature in this field four main approaches stand out. Two of them underlay to most of the research: associative networks and schemas. Two other are more recent: exemplar-based and parallel distributed processes approach. The first to mentioned approaches, which have prevailed in Social Cognition research, emphasize encoding over retrieval processes and lead research to focus almost exclusively in coding and organization of information processes and to neglect retrieval processes that are usually assumed to be invariant. The present paper aims to describe and compare the above mentioned approaches to memory representation, and to present theoretical and empirical arguments for the importance of retrieval processes, and to question the assumption of retrieval invariance explicitly or implicitly present in most of the work subsumed under the person memory literature.

Key words: Social cognition, memory methods, memory retrieval.

 

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text only available in PDF format.

 

 

REFERÊNCIAS

Abelson, R. P. (1976). Script processing in attitude formation and decision-making. In J. S. Carrol, & J. W. Payne (Eds.), Cognition and social behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.         [ Links ]

Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. M. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology. Worcester, Massachusetts: Clark University Press.         [ Links ]

Allport, G. W. (1992). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.         [ Links ]

Anderson, J. A. (1995). Associative networks. In M. A. Arbib (Ed.), Handbook of brain theory and neural networks (pp. 102-107). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.         [ Links ]

Anderson, J. R. (1980). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.         [ Links ]

Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.         [ Links ]

Anderson, M. C., & Neely, J. H. (1996). Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. In E. L. Bjork, & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory (pp. 237-313). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.         [ Links ]

Anderson, M. C., & Spellman, B. A. (1995). On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case. Psychological Review, 102, 68-100.         [ Links ]

Anderson, N. H. (1989). Functional memory and online attribution. In John N. Bassili (Ed), On-line cognition in person perception (pp. 175-220). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.         [ Links ]

Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impression of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290.         [ Links ]

Bodenhausen, G. (1990). Stereotypes as judgmental heuristics: Evidence of circadian variations in discrimination. Psychological Science, 1, 319-322.         [ Links ]

Bodenhausen, G., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1985). Effects of stereotypes on decision making and information processing strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 267-282.         [ Links ]

Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull, & R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (vol. 1, pp. 177-183). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.         [ Links ]

Brooks, L. (1978). Nonanalytic concept formation and memory for instances. In E. Rosch, & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 169-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.         [ Links ]

Bruner, J. S. (1973). Going beyond the information given. In J. M. Anglin (Ed.), Beyond the information given (pp. 218-243). New York: Norton. (Original work published 1957).         [ Links ]

Carlston, D. E., & Smith, E. R. (1996). Principles of mental representation. In E. T. Higgins, & A. W. Kruglansky (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 184-210). New York: Guilford Press.         [ Links ]

Carlston, D. E. (1992). Impression formation and the modular mind: The associated systems theory. In L. L. Martin, & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 301-341). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.         [ Links ]

Carlston, D. E. (1994). Associated systems theory: A systematic approach to cognitive representations of persons. In T. K. Srull, & R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.), Advances in social cognition: A dual process model of impression formation (Vol. 7, pp. 1-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.         [ Links ]

Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240-247.         [ Links ]

Craik, F. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.         [ Links ]

Sherman, S. J., Crawford, M. T., Hamilton, D. L., & Garcia-Marques, L. (in press). Social inference and social memory: The interplay between systems. in M. A. Hogg, & J. Cooper (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Social Psychology. London: Sage.         [ Links ]

Estes, W. K. (1986). Array models for category learning. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 500-549.         [ Links ]

Festinger, L. (1975). Teoria da dissonância cognitiva. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores.         [ Links ]

Fisher, R. P., & Craik, F. I. M. (1977). Interaction between encoding and retrieval operations in cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 701-711.         [ Links ]

Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York, NY: Academic Press.         [ Links ]

Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill International Editions.         [ Links ]

Garcia-Marques, L., & Hamilton, D. L. (1996). Resolving the apparent discrepancy between the incongruency and the expectancy-based illusory correlation effects: the TRAP model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 845-860.         [ Links ]

Garcia-Marques, L., Hamilton, D. L., & Maddox, K. (2002). Exhaustive and heuristic retrieval processes in person cognition: Further tests of the TRAP model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 193-207.         [ Links ]

Garrido, M. (2001). Processos de recuperação mnésica em cognição social. Tese de Mestrado em Psicologia Cognitiva. Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade de Lisboa.         [ Links ]

Gilovich, T. (1987). Secondhand information and the social judgement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 797-808.         [ Links ]

Glanzer, M. (1972). Storage mechanisms in recall. In G. H. Bower, & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol 5, pp. 129-193). New York: Academic Press.         [ Links ]

Hamilton, D. L. (Ed.) (1981). Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.         [ Links ]

Hamilton, D. L., & Gifford, R. K. (1976). Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis for stereotypic judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 832-845.         [ Links ]

Hamilton, D. L., & Rose, T. L. (1980). Illusory correlation and the maintenance of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 832-845.         [ Links ]

Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, J. W. (1994). Stereotypes. In R. S. Wyer, Jr., & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1-68). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.         [ Links ]

Hamilton, D. L., & Trolier, T. K. (1986). Stereotypes and stereotyping: An overview of the cognitive approach. In J. F. Dovidio, & S. L. Gartner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 127-163). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.         [ Links ]

Hastie, R. (1980). Memory for information which confirms or contradicts a general impression. In R. Hastie, T. M. Ostrom, E. B. Ebbesen, R. S. Wyer, D. L. Hamilton, & D. E. Carlston (Eds.), Person memory: The cognitive basis of social perception (pp. 155-177). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.         [ Links ]

Hastie, R. (1988). A computer simulation model of person memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 423-447.         [ Links ]

Hastie, R., & Kumar, P. A. (1979). Person memory: personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 25-38.         [ Links ]

Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory judgments depends on whether the judgments task is memory-based or on-line. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 258-268.         [ Links ]

Hastie, R., Ostrom, T. M., Ebbesen, E. B. Wyer, R. S., Jr., Hamilton, D. L., & Carlston, D. E. (1980). Person memory: The cognitive basis of social perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.         [ Links ]

Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins, & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford Press.         [ Links ]

Higgins, E. T., Herman, P. C., & Zanna, M. P. (1981). Social cognition: Ontario Symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.         [ Links ]

Hintzman, D. (1986). Schema abstraction in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.         [ Links ]

Hintzman, D. (1990). Human learning and memory: Connections and dissociations. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 109-139.         [ Links ]

Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., & Pike, R. (1989a). Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episode, semantic and procedural tasks. Psychological Review, 96, 208-233.         [ Links ]

Jacoby, L. L. (1975). Physical features versus meaning: A difference in decay? Memory and Cognition, 3, 247-251.         [ Links ]

Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9, 21-38.         [ Links ]

Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional influences of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.         [ Links ]

Jacoby, L. L., & Brooks, L. R. (1984). Nonanalytic cognition: Memory, perception, and concept learning. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 18). New York: Academic Press.         [ Links ]

Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the ralationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340.         [ Links ]

Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S., & Toth, J. P. (1992). Unconscious influences revealed: Attention, awareness and control. American Psychologist, 47, 802-809.         [ Links ]

Johnson, M. K., Kim, J. K., & Risse, G. (1985). Do alcoholic Korsakoff's syndrome patients acquire affective reactions? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 22-36

Jones, E., & Davis, K. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.         [ Links ]

Klein, S., & Loftus, J. (1990). Rethinking the role of organization in person memory: An independent trace storage model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 400-410.         [ Links ]

Kohler, W. (1947/1992). Gestalt psychology: An introduction to new concepts in modern psychology. New York: Liveright.         [ Links ]

Kunda, Z. (1999). Social Cognition: making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.         [ Links ]

Lewicki, P. (1985). Nonconscious biasing effects of single instances on subsequent judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 563-574.         [ Links ]

Lewin, K. (1965). Teoria de campo em ciência social. São Paulo: Liv. Pioneira Editora.         [ Links ]

Linville, P. W., Fischer, G. W., & Salovey, P. (1989). Perceived distributions of the characteristics of in-group and out-group members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 165-188.         [ Links ]

Linville, P. W., Salovey, P., & Fischer, G. W. (1986). Stereotype and perceived distribution of social characteristics: An application to ingroup-outgroup perception. In J. F. Dovidio, & S. L. Gartner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 165-208). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.         [ Links ]

Loftus, E., & Loftus, G. (1980). On the permanence of stored information in the human brain. American Psychologist, 35, 409-420.         [ Links ]

Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G., & Milne, A. (1998). Saying no to unwanted thoughts: Self-focus and the regulation of mental life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 578-589.         [ Links ]

Macrae, C. N., Hewstone, M., & Griffiths, R. J. (1993). Processing load and memory for stereotype-based information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 77-87.         [ Links ]

Markus, H., & Zajonc, R. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G. Lindzey, & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., vol. 1, pp. 137-230). New York: Random House.         [ Links ]

McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & Hinton, G. E. (1986). The appeal of parallel distributed processing. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (vol. 1, pp. 3-44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.         [ Links ]

Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238.         [ Links ]

Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.         [ Links ]

Newston, D. A. (1976). Foundations of attribution: The perception of ongoing behavior. In J. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. Kiss (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.         [ Links ]

Ostrom, T. M. (1984). The sovereignty of social cognition. In R. S. Wyer, Jr., & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.         [ Links ]

Ostrom, T. M., Skowronski, J. J., & Nowak, A. (1994). The cognitive foundations of attitudes: Its a wonderful world. In P. G. Devine, D. L. Hamilton, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Social cognition: Impact on social psychology (pp. 195-257). SD: Academic Press.         [ Links ]

Park, B., & Hastie, R. (1987). Perception of variability in category development: Instance versus abstraction-based stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 621-635.         [ Links ]

Raaijmakers, J., & Shiffrin, R. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93-134.         [ Links ]

Raaijmakers, J., & Shiffrin, R. (1992). Models for recall and recognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 205-234.         [ Links ]

Rajaram, S., & Roediger, H. L. (1993). Direct comparison of four implicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 765-776.         [ Links ]

Roediger, H. L., & Guynn, M. J. (1996). Retrieval Processes. In E. L. Bjork, & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory (pp. 179-237). San Diego CA: Academic Press.         [ Links ]

Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 803-814.         [ Links ]

Roediger, H. L., & Tulving, E. (1979). Exclusion of learned material from recall as a postretrieval operation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 601-615.         [ Links ]

Roediger, H. L., Weldon, M. S., & Challis, B. H. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implict and explicit measures pf retention: A processing account. In H. L. Roediger, & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.         [ Links ]

Roediger, H. L. (2000). Why retrieval is the key process in understanding human memory. In E. Tulving, Endel (Eds.), Memory, consciousness, and the brain: The Tallinn Conference (pp. 52-75). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.         [ Links ]

Rothbart, M., & John, O. P. (1985). Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 81-104.         [ Links ]

Santos, S. (2001). A instabilidade dos estereótipos: experiências em cognição social com uma metodologia de teste-reteste longitudinal. Tese de Mestrado em Psicologia Cognitiva. Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade de Lisboa.         [ Links ]

Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 13, 501-518.         [ Links ]

Semon, R. (1921). The mneme. London: Allen & Un-win.         [ Links ]

Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper & Row.         [ Links ]

Smith, E. R. (1991). Illusory correlation in a simulated exemplar-based memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 107-123.         [ Links ]

Smith, E. R. (1988). Category accessibility effects in a simulated exemplar-based memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 448-463.         [ Links ]

Smith, E. R. (1990). Content and process specificity in the effects of prior experiences. In T. K. Srull, & R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (vol. 3, pp. 1-60). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.         [ Links ]

Smith, E. R. (1996). What do connectionism and social psychology offer each other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 893-912.         [ Links ]

Smith, E. R. (1998). Mental representation and memory. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 391-445). McGraw-Hill.         [ Links ]

Smith, E. R., & Zárate, M. A. (1990). Exemplar and prototype use in social categorization. Social Cognition, 8, 243-262.         [ Links ]

Smith, E. R., & Zárate, M. A. (1992). Exemplar based model of social judgment. Psychological Review, 99, 3-21.         [ Links ]

Tulving, E. (1974). Cue-dependent forgetting. American Scientist, 62, 74-82.         [ Links ]

Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.         [ Links ]

Tulving, E., & Pearlstone, Z. (1966). Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 381-391.         [ Links ]

Underwood, B. J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 122-129.         [ Links ]

Warrington, E. K., & Weiskrantz, L. (1968). New method of testing long-term retention with special reference to amnesic patients. Nature, 217, 972-974.         [ Links ]

Warrington, E. K., & Weiskrantz, L. (1970). Amnesic syndrome: Consolidation or retrieval? Nature, 228, 629-630.         [ Links ]

Waugh, N. C., & Norman, D. A. (1965). Primary memory. Psychological Review, 72, 89-104.         [ Links ]

Weiner, B. (1966). Effects of motivation on the availability and retrieval of memory traces. Psychological Bulletin, 65, 24-37.         [ Links ]

Whittlesea, B. (1987). Preservation of specific experiences in representation of general knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 3-17.         [ Links ]

Wyer, R. S., & Carlston, D. E. (1979). Social cognition, inference and attribution. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.         [ Links ]

Wyer, R. S., Jr., & Carlston, D. (1994). The cognitive representation of persons and events. In R. S. Wyer, Jr., & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of Social Cognition (2nd ed., pp. 41-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.         [ Links ]

Wyer, R. S., Jr., & Srull, T. K. (1989). Memory and cognition in its social context. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.         [ Links ]

 

(*) Departamento de Psicologia Social e das Organizações, ISCTE.

(**) Faculdade de Psicologia e Ciências da Educação da Universidade de Lisboa.

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons