SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 issue2Investigações interculturais de cariz piagetianoGoal instability, self-esteem, and vocational identity of high school Portuguese students author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Análise Psicológica

Print version ISSN 0870-8231

Aná. Psicológica vol.21 no.2 Lisboa Apr. 2003

 

As diferenças entre os sexos: Mito ou realidade? (*)

 

GABRIELLE POESCHL (**)

CLÁUDIA MÚRIAS (**)

RAQUEL RIBEIRO (**)

 

 

RESUMO

Este trabalho procura retratar os desenvolvimentos sucessivos da produção científica sobre a questão da existência de diferenças entre os sexos e das suas origens, que tem uma história longa e fértil. Começamos por evocar as ideologias produzidas no Séc. XIX para explicar as posições desiguais dos dois grupos sexuais por disposições naturais, e os primeiros trabalhos académicos consagrados a identificar os traços, competências e comportamentos que, supostamente, deveriam diferenciar homens e mulheres. Propomos alguns apanhados dos trabalhos actuais sobre as diferenças entre os sexos e sobre a controvérsia, aparentemente suscitada pelas diferentes posições políticas dos autores, a propósito da verdadeira existência dessas diferenças. Apresentamos, por último, algumas teorias que são, actualmente, desenvolvidas pelos autores que defendem a existência de diferenças entre homens e mulheres, na procura de dar sentido a essas diferenças.

Palavras-chave: Diferenças entre os sexos, estereótipos de género, papéis de género.

 

 

ABSTRACT

This paper aims at retracing the successive developments of the scientific production on the question of the existence of sex differences and on their origins, which have a fertile and a long story. We begin by evoking the ideologies developed in the XIXth century in order to explain the unequal social positions of the sexes by natural dispositions, and the first academic works aimed at identifying the traits, aptitudes and behaviors that, supposedly, should differentiate men and women. We propose some insights at the present work on sex differences and at the controversies, apparently generated by the different political positions of the authors, on the real existence of such differences. We finally present some of the theories that are presently developed by the authors who defend the existence of differences between men and women in order to give sense to these differences.

Key words: Sex differences, gender stereotypes, gender roles.

 

 

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text only available in PDF format.

 

 

REFERÊNCIAS

Amâncio, L., & Nogueira, C. (1995). Gender, management and science. Braga: Edições da Universidade do Minho.         [ Links ]

Anson, O., & Sagy, S. (1995). Marital violence: Comparing women in violent and nonviolent unions. Human Relations, 48, 285-305.         [ Links ]

Archer, J. (1996). Sex Differences in Social Behavior. Are the Social Role and Evolutionary Explanations Compatible? American Psychologist, 51 (9), 909-917.         [ Links ]

Archer, J., & Haigh, A. (1996). Do beliefs about aggressive feelings and actions predict reported levels of aggression? Britisch Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 1-23.         [ Links ]

Ashmore, R. D., Del Boca, F. K., & Wohlers, A. J. (1986). Gender stereotypes. In R. D. Ashmore, & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Female-Male Relations (pp. 69-121). New York: Academic Press.         [ Links ]

Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human experience. Chicago: Rand McNally.        [ Links ]

Baudelot, C., & Establet, R. (1992). Allez les filles! Paris: Editions du Seuil.         [ Links ]

Bawin-Legros, B. (1988). Familles, mariage, divorce. Une sociologie des comportements familiaux contemporains. Liège: Mardaga.         [ Links ]

Belotti, E. G. (1973). Du côté des petites filles. Paris: Editions des Femmes.         [ Links ]

Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 155-162.         [ Links ]

Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.         [ Links ]

Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (1993). Consequences of gender differences in mathematical reasoning ability and some biological linkages. In M. Hang, R. E. Whalen, C. Aron, & K. L. Olsen (Eds.), The development of sex differences and similarities in behavior (pp. 87-109). London: Kluwen Academic.         [ Links ]

Betzig, L. (1993). Sex, secession, and stratification in the first six civilizations: How powerful men reproduced, passed power on to their sons, and used power to defend their wealth, women and children. In L. Ellis (Ed.), Social stratification and socioeconomic inequality: A comparative biosocial analysis (pp. 37-74). Westport, CT: Praeger.         [ Links ]

Bilous, F. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1988). Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behavior of same- and mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Language and Communication, 8, 183-194.         [ Links ]

Bjorkqvist, K. (1995). Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles, 30, 177-188.         [ Links ]

Born, M. P., Bleichrodt, N., & Van der Flier, H. (1987). Cross-cultural comparison of sex-related differences on intelligence tests: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 283-314.         [ Links ]

Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: a current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59-78.         [ Links ]

Brown, R. (1988). Group processes. Dynamics within and between groups. Oxford: Blackwell.         [ Links ]

Burr, V. (1998). Gender and Social Psychology. London: Routledge.         [ Links ]

Buss, D. M. (1992). Mate preference mechanisms: Consequences for partner choice and intrasexual competition. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind. Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 249266). New York: Oxford University Press.         [ Links ]

Buss, D. M. (1996). The evolutionary psychology of human social strategies. In E. T. Higgins, & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York: The Guildford Press.        [ Links ]

Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution,physiology, and psychology. Psychology Science, 3, 251-255.         [ Links ]

Comissão das Comunidades Europeias (1997). Relatório anual da Comissão. Igualdade de oportunidades entre mulheres e homens na União Europeia. 1996. Bruxelas.         [ Links ]

Connell, R. W. (1993). Gender and power. Society, the person and sexual politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.         [ Links ]

Constantinople, A. (1986). Masculinité/Féminité. Exception à un célèbre adage. In M. C. Hurtig, & M. F. Pichevin (Eds.), La différence des sexes (pp. 225-250). Paris: Tierce Sciences.         [ Links ]

Crick, N. (1995). Relational aggression: The role of intent attributions, feelings of distress and provocation type. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 313-322.         [ Links ]

Deaux, K. (1990). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender. In A. G. Halberstadt, & S. L. Ellyson (Eds.), Social Psychology Readings. New York: McGraw-Hill.         [ Links ]

Deaux, K., & Emswiller, T. (1974). Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks: What is skill for the male is luck for the female. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 80-85.         [ Links ]

Deaux, K., & Lafrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed, pp. 788-827). New York: McGraw-Hill.         [ Links ]

Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369-389.         [ Links ]

Deutsch, L. M. (1990). Status, sex, and smiling: The effect of role on smiling in men and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 531-540.        [ Links ]

Durkheim, E. (1893). La division du travail social: Etude sur l' organisation des sociétés supérieures. Paris: Alcan.         [ Links ]

Eagly, A. H. (1983). Gender and social influence: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 38 (9), 971-981.         [ Links ]

Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.         [ Links ]

Eagly, A. H. (1995). The science of politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 50 (3), 145-158.         [ Links ]

Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (1981). Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenciability: A meta-analysis of social influence studies. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 1-20.         [ Links ]

Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 283-308.         [ Links ]

Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior. A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 309-330.         [ Links ]

Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1985). Gender and influenciability: Stereotype versus behavior. In V. E. O-Leary, R. K. Unger, & B. S. Wallston (Eds.), Women, gender, and social psychology (pp. 225-256). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.         [ Links ]

Engels, F. (1884, 1974). L' origine de la famille, de la propriété privée et de l' Etat. Paris: Editions Sociales.         [ Links ]

Fausto-Sterling, A. (1985). Myths and gender: Biological theories about women and men. New York: Basic Books.         [ Links ]

Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive Gender Differences are Disappearing. American Psychologist, 43, 95-103.         [ Links ]

Freud, S. (1908). Über infantile Sexualtheorien. Gesammelte Werke, VII. London: Imago.         [ Links ]

Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York: Norton.         [ Links ]

Giddens, A. (1982). Sociology: A brief but critical introduction. London: MacMillan.         [ Links ]

Goldberg, P. (1968). Are women prejudiced against women? Transaction, 5, 28-30.         [ Links ]

Gould, S. J. (1983). La mal-mesure de l' homme. Paris: Editions Ramsay.         [ Links ]

Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845-875.         [ Links ]

Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.         [ Links ]

Halpern, D. F. (1989). The disappearance of cognitive gender differences: What you see depends were you look. American Psychologist, 44 (8), 1156-1158.         [ Links ]

Halpern, D. F. (1992). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.         [ Links ]

Hare-Mustin, R. T., & Marecek, J. (1988). The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology. American Psychology, 43, 455-464.         [ Links ]

Harvey, L., Burnham, R. W., Kendall, K., & Pease, K. (1992). Gender differences in criminal justice: An international comparison. British Journal of Criminology, 32, 2.8-217.         [ Links ]

Henley, N. M. (1977). Body politics. Power, sex and non-verbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.         [ Links ]

Herla, G. (1987). Partage des responsabilités familiales, attitudes et comportements effectifs. Les Cahiers de Psychologie Sociale, 35, 9-50.         [ Links ]

Hinde, R. A. (1995). The adaptionist approach has its limits. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 50-53.         [ Links ]

Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.         [ Links ]

Hupka, R. B., & Bank, A. L. (1996). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution or social construction? Cross-Cultural Research, 30, 24-59.         [ Links ]

Hyde, J. S. (1981). How large are cognitive gender differences? A meta-analysis using co2 and d. American Psychologist, 36, 892-901.         [ Links ]

Hyde, J. S. (1984). How large are gender differences in aggression? A developmental meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 20, 722-736.         [ Links ]

Hyde, J. S. (1986). Gender differences in aggression. In J. S. Hyde, & M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp.51-66). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.         [ Links ]

Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematical performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139-155.         [ Links ]

Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (Eds.) (1986). The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.         [ Links ]

Johnson, R. A., & Schulman, G. I. (1989). Gender-role composition and role entrapment in decision-making groups. Gender and Society, 3, 355-372.         [ Links ]

Kellerhals, J., Troutot, P. Y., & Lazega, E. (1993). Microsociologie de la famille. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.         [ Links ]

Lee, P. C. (1986). Psychologie et différences entre les sexes. In M. C. Hurtig, & M. F. Pichevin (Eds.), La différence des sexes (pp. 63-75). Paris: Tierce Sciences.         [ Links ]

Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181-1209.         [ Links ]

Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1994). Les androgynes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.         [ Links ]

Lott, B. (1996). Politics or science? The question of gender sameness/difference. American Psychologist, 51 (2), 155-157.         [ Links ]

Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.         [ Links ]

Masters, M. S., & Sanders, B. (1993). Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing? Behavior Genetics, 23, 337-341.         [ Links ]

Michel, A. (1983). Sociologia da família e do casamento. Porto: Rés-Editora.         [ Links ]

Mill, J. S. (1869). L' assujettissement des femmes. Paris: Guillaumin.         [ Links ]

Morawski, J. (1996). Gender theories. In S. I. Kutler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the United States in the twentieth century (vol. 2, pp. 899-915). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.         [ Links ]

Morgado, I. A., Cangemi, J. P., Miller, R., & O-Connor, J. (1993). Accuracy of decoding facial expressionsin those engaged in people-oriented activities vs. those engaged in non-people oriented activities. Studia Psychologica, 35, 73-80.         [ Links ]

Moskowitz, D. S., Suh, E. J., & Desaulniers, J. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 753-761.         [ Links ]

Mulac, A. (1989). Men's and women's talk in same-gender and mixed-gender dyads. Power or polemic? Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 8, 249-270.         [ Links ]

Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29-51.         [ Links ]

Ortner, S. B., & Whitehead, H. (Eds.) (1981). Sexual meanings: The cultural construction of gender and sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.         [ Links ]

Parker, S. T. (1987). A sexual selection model for hominid evolution. Human Evolution, 2, 235-253.         [ Links ]

Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1956). Family: Socialization, and interaction process. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.         [ Links ]

Perry, D. G., Perry, L. C., & Weiss, R. J. (1989). Sex differences in the consequences that children anticipate for aggression. Developmental Psychology, 25, 312-319.         [ Links ]

Poeschl, G. (1992). L' intelligence: un concept à la recherche d' un sens. Universidade de Genebra: tese de doutoramento.         [ Links ]

Rigolage, E. (s/d). Auguste Comte: La philosophie positive. Paris: Paris: Flammarion.         [ Links ]

Rosenkrantz, P. S., Vogel, S. R., Bee, H., Broverman, I. K., & Broverman, D. M. (1968). Sex-role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32, 287-295.         [ Links ]

Saraceno, C. (1997). Sociologia da família. Lisboa: Editorial Estampa.         [ Links ]

Sears, D. O., Peplau, L. A., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.         [ Links ]

Sherriffs, A. C., & McKee, J. P. (1957). Qualitative aspects of beliefs about men and women. Journal of Personality, 25, 451-464.         [ Links ]

Shields, S. A. (1986). Fonctionnalisme, darwinisme et psychologie des femmes. Etude d' un mythe social. In M. C. Hurtig, & M. F. Pichevin (Eds.), La différence des sexes (pp. 29-61). Paris: Tierce Sciences.         [ Links ]

Silverstein, L. B. (1996). Evolutionary psychology and the search for sex differences. American Psychologist, 51 (2), 160-161.         [ Links ]

Skinner, P. H., & Shelton, R. L. (1985). Speech, language, and hearing: Normal processes and disorders, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.         [ Links ]

Spence, J. T. (1985). Gender identity and implications for concepts of masculinity and femininity. In T. B. Sonderegg (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Psychology and gender (Vol. 32, pp. 59-96). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.         [ Links ]

Spence, J. T., Deaux, K., & Helmreich, R. L. (1985). Sex roles in contemporary American society. In G. Lindzey, & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 3.ª ed, pp. 149-178). Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.         [ Links ]

Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1974). The personal attributes questionnaire: A measure of sex-role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43-44.         [ Links ]

Spencer, H. (1891). The study of sociology. New York: Appleton.         [ Links ]

Strong, E. K. (1936). Interest of men and women. Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 49-67.         [ Links ]

Strong, E. K. (1943). Vocational interests of men and women. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.         [ Links ]

Sutaria, S. D. (1985). Specific learning disabilities: Nature and needs. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.         [ Links ]

Swim, J. K. (1994). Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 21-36.         [ Links ]

Terman, L. M., & Miles, C. C. (1936). Sex and personality: Studies in masculinity and femininity. New York: McGraw Hill.         [ Links ]

Unger, R. (1986). Pour une nouvelle définition du sexe et du genre. In M. C. Hurtig, & M. F. Pichevin (Eds.), La différence des sexes (pp. 299-319). Paris: Tierce Sciences.         [ Links ]

Unger, R., & Crawford, M. (1992). Women and gender: A feminist psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.         [ Links ]

Waxler, N. E., & Mishler, E. G. (1970). Experimental studies of families. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 5. New York: Academic Press.         [ Links ]

Wiederman, M. W., & Allgeier, E. R. (1993). Gender differences in sexual jealousy: Adaptational or social learning explanations? Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 115-140.         [ Links ]

Wilder, G. Z., & Powell, K. (1989). Sex differences in test performance: A survey of the literature. College Board Report #89-3. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.         [ Links ]

Williams, J. E., & Bennett, S. M. (1975). The definition of sex stereotypes via the adjective check list. Sex Roles, 1, 327-337.         [ Links ]

Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1982). Measuring sex stereotypes: A thirty nations study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.         [ Links ]

Zelditch, M. (1956). Role differenciation in the nuclear family. In T. Parsons, & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Family: Socialization, and interaction process. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.         [ Links ]

 

 

(*)Este trabalho foi realizado com o apoio da Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Projecto POCTI 36451/PSI/00/2000).

A correspondência relativa a este trabalho pode ser endereçada a Gabrielle Poeschl, Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, 1055, 4169-004 Porto (e-mail: gpoeschl@psi.up.pt).

(**)Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade do Porto.

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License