SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 número3Significações parentais e adesão em psicologia pediátricaA doente veterana: Saberes esquecidos nos sistemas de saúde índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Análise Psicológica

versão impressa ISSN 0870-8231

Aná. Psicológica v.17 n.3 Lisboa set. 1999

 

Estudos sobre qualidade de vida em mulheres submetidas a histerectomia ou anexectomia para tratamento de cancro do útero ou ovário (*)

Helena Baltar Lopes (**)

José Luis Pais Ribeiro (***)

Isabel Pereira Leal (****)

RESUMO

Neste artigo é apresentado um estudo exploratório da qualidade de vida em doentes que foram submetidas a histerectomia e/ou anexectomia para tratamento de cancro do útero ou ovário. O objectivo do trabalho é conhecer e compreender a influência desses acontecimentos na qualidade de vida das mulheres, tendo sido utilizado como instrumento de avaliação o Questionário de Avaliação da Qualidade de Vida, F-84.

Procurou-se, ainda, comparar o estado de saúde desse grupo de doentes com o estado de saúde de um grupo de mulheres «sem» doença e que não foram submetidas a nenhum tipo de cirurgia ginecológica, com o objectivo de estimar os efeitos destes acontecimentos em diferentes aspectos de saúde, avaliados através de uma medida de saúde multidimensional (Questionário de Estado de Saúde, SF-36).

São discutidos aspectos da psicologia da avaliação da qualidade de vida de doentes oncológicos, sendo questionados os resultados de estudos realizados nesta área e sugeridas hipóteses para explicar estes resultados.

Palavras-chave: Cancro do ovário, cancro do útero, histerectomia, anexectomia, qualidade de vida, Questionário de Avaliação da Qualidade de Vida (F-84), Questionário de Estado de Saúde (SF-36).

 

 

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present an exploratory study on the quality of life of patients subjected to hysterectomy and/or oophorectomies for uterus or ovary cancer treatment. The main objective is to understand the influence of these events on women's quality of life, using as a evaluation instrument the F-84 Quality of Life Assessment Survey.

We also compare the patient's group health status with a group of women «without disease», that had never been subjected to any kind of gynaecological surgery, in order to estimate the effects of these events in different aspects of health, assessed with the multidimensional health scale, the SF-36 Health Survey.

Different aspects of the psychology of quality of life assessment are discussed, as well as the results of the work done in this area with cancer patients, and hypothesis are raised to explain the results.

Key words: Ovarian cancer, uterine cancer, annexohisterectomy, quality of life, the F-84 Quality of Life Assessment Survey, the SF-36 Health Survey.

 

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text only available in PDF format.

 

 

REFERÊNCIAS

Andersen, B. (1985). Women with cancer: Psychological perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag.

        [ Links ]

Andersen, B. (1989). Health psychology's contribution to addressing the cancer problem: update on accomplishments. Health Psychology, 8 (6), 683-703.

Andersen, B., Anderson, B., & Prosse, C. (1989). Controlled prospective longitudinal study of women with cancer. II. Psychological outcomes. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 57, 692-697.

Baider, L., & Sarrell, M. (1984). Couples in crisis: patient-spouse differences in perception of interaction patterns and the illness situation. Family Therapy, 11, 115-122.

Barofsky, I., & Sugarbaker, P. (1990). Cancer. In B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of life assessments in clinical trials (pp. 419-439). New York: Raven Press.

Brown, R., Haddox, V., Posada, A., & Rubio, A. (1972). Social and psychological adjustment following pelvic exenteration. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 114, 162-171.

Byrne, J., Mulvihill, J., Connelly, R., Myers, M., Austin, D., Holmes, F., Holmes, G., Latourette, H., Meigs, J., & Strong, L. (1988). Reproductive problems and birth defects in survivors of Wilm's tumor and their relatives. Medical and Pediatric Oncology, 16, 233-240.

Callahan, E., Pawlicki, R., Nicholas, D., & Hamilton, S. (1993). Psychological aspects of gynecologic cancer. In R. Berkowitz, & R. Knapp (Eds.), Gynecology oncology (pp. 467-500). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Campbell, A., Converse, P., & Rodgers, W. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Cella, D., & Tross, S. (1986). Psychological adjustment to survival from Hodgkin's disease. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 616-622.

De Haes, J., & van Knippenberg, F. (1985). The quality of life of cancer patients: a review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine, 20, 808-817.

Font, A. (1994). Cancer y calidad de vida. Anuario de Psicología, 61, 41-50.

Friedenbergs, I., Gordon, W., Hibbard, M., et al. (18811982). Psychosocial aspects of living with cancer: a review of the literature. Int. J. Psychiatry Med., 11, 303-329.

Ganz, P., Haskell, C., Figlin, R., LaSota, N., & Siau, J. (1988). Estimating the quality of life in a clinical trial of patients with metastic lung cancer using the Karnofsky Performance Status and the Functional Living Index-Cancer. Cancer, 61, 849-856.

Gottesman, D., & Lewis, M. (1982). Difference in crisis reactions among cancer and surgery patients. J. Cons. Clin. Psychol., 50, 381-388.

Hagle, M. (1990). Cancer patient's experiences with portable chemotherapy pump. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 5547.

Helson, H., & Bevan, W. (1967). Contemporary approaches to psychology. Princeton: Van Nostrand.

Holland, J. (1990). Historical overview. In J. Holland, & J. Rowland (Eds.), Handbook of psychooncology: Psychological care of the patient with cancer (pp. 4-12). New York: Oxford University Press.

Hurny, C., Piasetsky, E., Bagin, R., & Holland, J. (1987). High social desirability in patients being treated for advanced colorectal or bladder cancer: eventual impact on the assessment of quality of life. J. Psychosoc. Oncol., 5, 19-29.

Irwin, P., Gottleb, A., Kramer, S., & Danoff, B. (1982). Quality of life after radiation therapy: a study of 309 cancer survivors. Soc. Indicators Res., 10, 187-210.

Jacobsen, P., & Holland, J. (1990). Psychological reactions to cancer surgery. In J. Holland, & J. Rowland (Eds.), Handbook of psychooncology: Psychological care of the patient with cancer (pp. 117-133). New York: Oxford University Press.

Lichtmann, R., & Taylor, S. (1986). Close relationships and the female cancer patient. In B. Andersen (Ed.), Women with cancer: Psychological perspectives (pp. 233-256). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Sutherland, H., Tibshirani, R., Ciampi, A., Till, J., & Boyd, N. (1984). Describing health states: methodological issues in obtaining values for health states. Med. Care, 22, 543-552.

McHorney, C., Ware, J., & Raczek, A. (1993). The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity inmeasuring physical and mental health constructs. Medical Care, 31 (3), 247-263.

Neuling, S., & Winefield, H. (1988). Social support and recovery after surgery for breast cancer: frequency and correlates of supportive behaviors by family, fiends, and surgeon. Social Science Medicine, 27, 385-392.

Ribeiro, J. (1996). Questionário de avaliação da qualidade de vida: F-84. Newsletter do Gru.Po-QDV, 2 (1), 2.

Roberts, C., Cox, C., Gibertini, M., Reintgen, D., & Baile, W. (1991). Surgeon as psychotherapist. Unpublished manuscript. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa.

Roldão, M. (1984). Carcinoma uterino: alguns aspectos terapêuticos. Jornal do Médico, 116 (2103), 582-595.

Schipper, H., Clinch, J., McMurray, A., & Levitt, M. (1984). Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: the Functional Living Index-Cancer: development and validation. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2, 472-483.

Silverberg, E. (1989). Cancer statistics 1989. Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 39 (1), 101-105.

Teeter, M., Holmes, G., Holmes, F., & Baker, A. (1987). Decisions about marriage and family among survivors of childhood cancer. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 5, 59-68.

Vera, M. (1981). Quality of life following pelvic exenteration. Gynecol. Oncol., 12, 355-366.

Ware, J., & Sherbourne, C. (1992). The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30 (6), 473-483.

WHOQOL Group (1993). Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Quality of Life Research, 2, 153-159.

Wortman, C., & Dunkel-Schetter, C. (1979). Interpersonal relationships and cancer: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 35, 120-155.

 

(*) Estudo realizado no âmbito de mestrado com bolsa do Programa Praxis XXI.

(**) Bolseira de Doutoramento do Programa Praxis XXI.

(***) Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade do Porto. Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa

(****) Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa.

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons