SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.5 número1Uma questão de derrotabilidadeO princípio jurídico da solidariedade e da partilha equitativa de responsabilidades entre Estados-membros na política de asilo da União Europeia: Anotação ao acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça (Grande Sala), República Eslovaca e Hungria/Conselho da União Europeia (C-643/15 e C-647/15), de 6 de setembro de 2017 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


e-Pública: Revista Eletrónica de Direito Público

versión On-line ISSN 2183-184X

Resumen

SACRAMENTO, Bruno. Reasonable disagreements and legislative discretion: a study based on the principles theory of constitutional rights. e-Pública [online]. 2018, vol.5, n.1, pp.241-275. ISSN 2183-184X.

This paper deals essentially with the relationship between fundamental rights, judicial review and the democratic principle in the context of so-called reasonable disagreements. The limits between legislative and judicial competence in the scope of the disagreements are problematized from a case judged by the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court that analyzed the constitutionality of the crime of abortion based on a balancing inspired by the principles theory of constitutional rights, by Robert Alexy. It is argued in this paper that it is possible to seek balance in this relationship through the theory of principles and the recognition of a space of legislative discretion. To this end, some ideas of the principles theory, of the Alexy’s theory of the argumentative representation and of the public justification will be associated.

Palabras clave : Judicial review; reasonable disagreements; argumentative representation; legislative discretion; public justification.

        · resumen en Portugués     · texto en Portugués     · Portugués ( pdf )