SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.2 número3Algumas dúvidas a respeito do conceito de Direito Positivo num Perímetro Global: Um comentário a “the Concept of Positive Law in Global Administrative Law” de Edouard Fromageau"Actores Privados e Práticas Públicas no Direito Administrativo global" Comentário a Rebecca Schmidt índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


e-Pública: Revista Eletrónica de Direito Público

versión On-line ISSN 2183-184X

Resumen

SCHMIDT, Rebecca. Private Actors and Public Practices in Global Administrative Law. e-Pública [online]. 2015, vol.2, n.3, pp.114-120. ISSN 2183-184X.

Based on the examination of the powerful, industry-based food safety regulator GlobalGAP this paper revisits the public-private distinction in Global Administrative Law (GAL). It argues that defining public as practice is the most coherent approach both from a practical as well as from a theoretical point of view. Using the GAL framework it is possible to identify acts and processes which are of common concern and ultimately public. In fact, looking at the normative goals of GAL it is striking what significant impacts an actor such as GlobalGAP has on common public concerns. Under these circumstances ‘complying' with GAL principles can be a venue even for formally private actors to create public processes which ultimately better correspond the public character it has in some of its regulatory activities.

Palabras clave : Public-Private Distinction; Global Governance; Private Actors; Public Practices; GlobalGAP.

        · resumen en Portugués     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )