SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.2 issue3Are we positive about positive law in a global sphere?: A comment on Edouard Fromageau's “the Concept of Positive Law in Global Administrative Law”"Private Actors and Public Practices in Global Administrative Law" Comment on Rebecca Schmidt author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


e-Pública: Revista Eletrónica de Direito Público

On-line version ISSN 2183-184X

Abstract

SCHMIDT, Rebecca. Private Actors and Public Practices in Global Administrative Law. e-Pública [online]. 2015, vol.2, n.3, pp.114-120. ISSN 2183-184X.

Based on the examination of the powerful, industry-based food safety regulator GlobalGAP this paper revisits the public-private distinction in Global Administrative Law (GAL). It argues that defining public as practice is the most coherent approach both from a practical as well as from a theoretical point of view. Using the GAL framework it is possible to identify acts and processes which are of common concern and ultimately public. In fact, looking at the normative goals of GAL it is striking what significant impacts an actor such as GlobalGAP has on common public concerns. Under these circumstances ‘complying' with GAL principles can be a venue even for formally private actors to create public processes which ultimately better correspond the public character it has in some of its regulatory activities.

Keywords : Public-Private Distinction; Global Governance; Private Actors; Public Practices; GlobalGAP.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in English     · English ( pdf )