SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.2 issue3The Sins of Functional Differentiation: A CommentComment on Administrative self-regulation (“Innerecht”) and Global Administrative Law author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


e-Pública: Revista Eletrónica de Direito Público

On-line version ISSN 2183-184X

Abstract

KRAMER, Rike U.. Administrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative Law. e-Pública [online]. 2015, vol.2, n.3, pp.92-113. ISSN 2183-184X.

A new category of “law” is developing, Global Administrative Law (GAL). The goal of this new strand of literature is to capture and embed the discourse about global governance and bring it into the legal realm. One controversially debated question is whether all of these new phenomena categorised as global governance can be called proper law. This paper uses the concept of law developed by Benedict Kingsbury as well as the German administrative law concept to shed some light on the question of validity and weight. Kingsbury distinguishes between these two categories. In contrast, German administrative law distinguishes between internal law (only “law” in exceptional cases but weight attached) and external law (law in the proper sense). A comparison between Kingsbury's concept of law for GAL and the German approach can therefore enhance our understanding of law in the global space.

Keywords : Global Administrative Law; concept of law; Verwaltungsvorschriften; Innenrecht; waste management.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in English     · English ( pdf )