SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.2 issue3Transnational Law, Functional Differentiation and EvolutionAdministrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative Law author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


e-Pública: Revista Eletrónica de Direito Público

On-line version ISSN 2183-184X

Abstract

BRITO, Miguel Nogueira de. The Sins of Functional Differentiation: A Comment. e-Pública [online]. 2015, vol.2, n.3, pp.84-91. ISSN 2183-184X.

In his paper Gonçalo Vasconcelos Vilaça addresses several critiques concerning the systems theory's answer to the legitimacy problem of transnational law. This answer, according to him, could be summarized by the by the label “let's do nothing” (or “let us leave it to the systems themselves”). The critique I find particularly worth of exploring is the pointing out the social systems theory's allegedly implicit normative claim that functional differentiation and autopoietic systems “ought to be maintained, never short-circuited”. Can we adequately confront global risks and the expansive tendencies of the economic system just by means of such a modest normative claim?

Keywords : international and transnational systems of law; functional differentiation; Niklas Luhmann; social systems theory.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in English     · English ( pdf )