SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 número1Rotura do Tendão do Grande Peitoral: Revisão Sistemática dos Métodos de ReinserçãoSinovite vilonodular pigmentada do joelho: Tratamento da recidiva índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista Portuguesa de Ortopedia e Traumatologia

versão impressa ISSN 1646-2122versão On-line ISSN 1646-2939

Resumo

SOUSA, Ricardo et al. Tratamento de Infeções Protésicas com Desbridamento e Preservação do Implante: Resultados da Aplicação Prospetiva de um Protocolo Pré-estabelecido. Rev. Port. Ortop. Traum. [online]. 2017, vol.25, n.1, pp.16-27. ISSN 1646-2122.

Study Goal: Treating prosthetic joint infections is complex and the results of debridement with implant retention are often unpredictable. Our hypothesis is that it is possible to offer a good chance for success as long as simple patient selection and treatment guidelines are met. The goal of this paper is to present the results of prospectively applying these principles over the past few years in our institution. Material and Methods: This is a prospective clinical study including patients with prosthetic joint infection treated since January/2012 and a 12 months’ minimum follow-up after treatment discontinuation. Only patients with a stable prosthesis with no signs of loosening, good soft tissues and short duration of symptoms were candidates to debridement with implant retention. Surgery was performed by the same surgeon and it always included mobile parts exchange. Whenever possible, antibiotic therapy included agents effective against bacteria within the biofilm. Results: Twenty-four patients (15 knees and 9 hips) with a mean age of 65 years were included. One patient was excluded from the analysis of results as a result of unrelated death. There were three cases of treatment failure, resulting in an overall success rate of 87% (20/23) with an average 30 months’ follow-up after discontinuing antibiotic therapy. Conclusion: Following a predetermined treatment protocol allows for good results in the treatment of prosthetic joint infections even when choosing to preserve the implant.

Palavras-chave : Hip Prosthesis; Knee Prosthesis; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Cohort Studies; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Retention; Therapeutic Irrigation; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Treatment Outcome.

        · resumo em Português     · texto em Português     · Português ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons