SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.24 issue1The Portuguese version of the Retrospective Self-Report of Inhibition: a psychometric analysis of RSRI in an Adolescent Community SamplePleasure and suffering at work: A diagnosis study about workers that practice sky-diving in leisure time author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Psicologia

Print version ISSN 0874-2049

Abstract

SANTOS, Maria Helena  and  AMANCIO, Lígia. Competence, Gender Inequality and Affirmative Action Measures: A “Natural” or a “Competence” Issue?. Psicologia [online]. 2010, vol.24, n.1, pp.117-140. ISSN 0874-2049.

Women’s political under-representation is still a reality (Inter-Parliamentary Union, 2010) and the literature has pointed out several factors to explain the origin of the gender inequality in this context. Affirmative action measures have been implemented in order to promote equality. However, these measures have generated great controversy, being accused of unfairness for violating the merit principle. Following a previous research (Santos, 2004), this study aims at: confirming the genderization of representations held by individuals who are not professional politicians regarding politicians’ activity, through its association to the male sphere; understanding how those individuals perceive gender inequality in politics; and knowing what those individuals think about the measures aimed at reducing this inequality. Among the factors/obstacles identified, we highlight the discourses around the “naturalization” of History and the merit genderization which is mainly limited to personality traits which are seldom associated with the female stereotype.

Keywords : discrimination; politics; gender; affirmative action; competence.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in Portuguese     · Portuguese ( pdf )