SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 número3Perfil de diversidade da comunidade estafilocócica da pele em doentes com dermatite atópicaNefrite intersticial aguda induzida pela piperacilina-tazobactam? índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista Portuguesa de Imunoalergologia

versão impressa ISSN 0871-9721

Resumo

BORREGO, Luís Miguel et al. Lung function evaluation: Comparing fixed percentual values and the 5th percentile for diagnosing airway obstruction. Rev Port Imunoalergologia [online]. 2013, vol.21, n.3, pp.197-205. ISSN 0871-9721.

Introduction: Fixed criteria have been classically used in the functional characterization of patients with respiratory diseases. International guidelines actually recommend the preferential use of the lower (LNN) or upper limit of normality (below or above the 5th percentile). Objective: To compare the results of lung function (LF) obtained in clinical practice for diagnosis of airway obstruction, using fixed percentage values versus the 5th percentile (the reference standard) as normality limits. Methods: Retrospective analysis of LF (spirometry and body plethysmography) performed in 2011 by the authors. It has been evaluated the concordance of both methods in the global sample, and divided by age groups. Those with criteria for airway obstruction considering the FEV1/VC (forced expiratory volume in one second / vital capacity) ratio < LLN were selected and among these, we analyzed FEV1, FVC (forced vital capacity), TLC (total lung capacity) and RV (residual volume) considering the 5th percentile and the fixed percentage values. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 20.0, using Cohen’s Kappa test. Results: During 2011, 1358 subjects underwent LF; 8 were excluded due to incomplete data. Overall, the agreement between the two criteria was kappa = 0.655 ± 0.035. Among the 124 patients who had obstruction diagnosed by LLN, 32 (26%) had a normal test with the 0.70 cut -off, and would be wrongly underdiagnosed. This occurred only in younger age groups, while in older ones a high rate of overdiagnosis (51 subjects - 36%) was observed. Among patients with airway obstruction, the agreement of the 2 criteria for the remaining parameters was good, except for inflation diagnosed with TLC. Conclusion: Using fixed percentage criteria for the diagnosing airway obstruction leads to a high rate of underdiagnosis in younger and overdiagnosis in older ages.

Palavras-chave : Asthma; bronchial obstruction; diagnostic tests; reference standards.

        · resumo em Português     · texto em Português     · Português ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons