Abstract

CAMACHO, Maria J. et al. Extraction of potato cyst nematodes from soil samples: Cobb’s decanting and sieving method vs. Fenwick’s method. Rev. de Ciências Agrárias [online]. 2018, vol.41, n.spe, pp.21-30. ISSN 0871-018X.  https://doi.org/10.19084/RCA.17061.

Potato cyst nematodes are a threat to several agricultural crops around the world with some species considered quarantine pests and subjected to strict regulatory measures in many countries. Usually, cysts nematodes co-exist in the soil with other species of plant-parasitic nematodes, so, a time and cost-efficient extraction technique becomes of primary importance. The ideal extraction method should be able to obtain cysts as well as detecting the presence of other motile plant-parasitic nematodes with a potential impact on potato farming (such as Meloidogyne sp. and Pratylenchus sp.). In recent years, studies have been carried out to test the efficiency of various methods of nematode extraction but few results have been published. Therefore, to test if a method that extracts simultaneously cysts and motile nematodes can be used instead of the reference method that extracts cysts only, the efficiency of Cobb’s decanting and sieving technique was compared to Fenwick’s technique. As a result, in the 74 samples evaluated, a greater number of cysts were extracted from 24 samples using Fenwick’s method and from 11 samples employing Cobb’s decanting and sieving technique. The statistics results showed a significance level of 0,05 using Fenwick’s can allowing to conclude that this method is much more efficient than Cobb’s decanting and sieving technique, and confirming it should not be replaced by alternative methods for cysts extraction.

Keywords : extraction techniques; Globodera pallida; Globodera rostochiensis; nematodes; PCN.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in English     · English ( pdf )